|
[Sponsors] |
Thermodynamic data using the CEA (9-coefficients) polynomial format |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
April 13, 2020, 20:16 |
Thermodynamic data using the CEA (9-coefficients) polynomial format
|
#1 |
New Member
Jiaui Zhang
Join Date: Aug 2018
Location: Changsha, China
Posts: 17
Rep Power: 8 |
Hi Foamers!
Recently, I found that the enthalpy value of aluminum (in gas phase) calculated by the 7-coefficients polynomial in chemkin format has a large error compared with JANAF database (see https://janaf.nist.gov/tables/Al-005.html). On the contrary, the 9-coefficients CEA polynomial function works (see, https://www.grc.nasa.gov/WWW/CEAWeb/TP-2002-211556.pdf) much better. Please see the attached fig, circles indicate experimental data and CEA 9-co indicates the result calculated by CEA polynomial function and Chemkin 7-co indicates the result calculated by 7-coefficients polynomial in CHEMKINThermoFile, x axis represents the temperature and y axis represent the enthalpy of aluminum with reference temperature of 298.15K So: did anyone implement this 9-coefficients CEA function in OF? or is there any way to implement this function in OF? Jiarui Last edited by charryzzz; April 19, 2020 at 05:15. |
|
May 6, 2020, 05:19 |
|
#2 |
New Member
Jiaui Zhang
Join Date: Aug 2018
Location: Changsha, China
Posts: 17
Rep Power: 8 |
Sorry, I found I made a mistake in calculating the enthalpy, the 7-coefficent chemkin polynomial works as good as CEA polynomial in the temperature range of 300- 5000K
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Saving data transient simulation - file format | batdan | FLUENT | 0 | June 21, 2019 05:55 |
External Magnetic Field Data Format for FLUENT MHD Module | eduardvinter | FLUENT | 0 | January 24, 2019 02:54 |
NASTRAN Data format | Srinivasan Arunajatesan | Main CFD Forum | 1 | January 2, 2014 07:20 |
Fieldview Data Format?? | Choong K. Yoo | FieldView | 0 | August 23, 1999 20:59 |
THERMODYNAMIC DATA | RAZA | Main CFD Forum | 0 | August 2, 1998 09:29 |