|
[Sponsors] |
Sandia Flame D OpenFoam tutorial case - bad result? |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
September 5, 2019, 07:31 |
Sandia Flame D OpenFoam tutorial case - bad result?
|
#1 |
New Member
Mark
Join Date: Oct 2018
Posts: 18
Rep Power: 8 |
Hi there!
I am trying to study combustion modelling within OpenFoam and am currently looking into the Sandia Flame D case - /opt/openfoam6/tutorials/combustion/reactingFoam/RAS/SandiaD_LTS I copy the case into my own directory and execute provided Allrun script. The results of the temperature field at the last time step are shown in the first picture (myD). However (to me) - these results seem to be incorrect. If you google Sandia D flame tutorial in openFoam you get these screenshots that make more sense in terms of results. For example from the following thesis(http://repozitorij.fsb.hr/9279/1/Del..._diplomski.pdf), page 79 (picture D2) - the results are very different yet according to the information there the conditions are identical to those found in the OpenFoam tutorial case. Also there is a paper (https://link.springer.com/article/10...494-014-9561-5) looking into Sandia D flames and their OpenFoam simulation looks as follows (D3). So my question is do I need to work with the case and modify to achieve these more sensible results or is it just a simple question of post-processing -as I assume the in-built openFoam tutorial on this case is correct. Thank you! |
|
September 6, 2019, 11:37 |
|
#2 |
New Member
Mark
Join Date: Oct 2018
Posts: 18
Rep Power: 8 |
Update on this -- I installed the most recent dev version of OpenFoam, which contains the updated Sandia Flame D tutorial and produces much better results.
|
|
September 11, 2019, 04:35 |
|
#3 |
Senior Member
Ruiyan Chen
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: Hangzhou, China
Posts: 162
Rep Power: 10 |
Hi Brandani,
Would it be possible for you to share the updated results you mentioned? We are implementing the flamelet/progress variable approach in OpenFOAM, and obviously Flame D is one of the most used benchmark cases. I wonder what the results look like using the existing solvers in OpenFOAM. Thanks! |
|
September 11, 2019, 06:10 |
|
#4 | |
New Member
Mark
Join Date: Oct 2018
Posts: 18
Rep Power: 8 |
Quote:
1) What I was saying is that SandiaD flame in OpenFOAM version 6 seemed to produce inaccurate results (I believe there was no ignition with the EDC combustion model - 1st picture in my first post) 2) Then, what I found is that the OpenFOAM development version (https://openfoam.org/version/dev/) + OpenFoam v7 (https://openfoam.org/release/7/) must have had their in-built tutorial on Sandia Flame D updated because there was ignition and results seem to match those pictures (2nd and 3rd) I attached in my first post 3) So install v7 or the dev version of OpenFOAM and you will have a working base case. I did not do any modifications to the case in these versions. Hope this helps! |
||
September 11, 2019, 06:14 |
|
#5 | |
New Member
Mark
Join Date: Oct 2018
Posts: 18
Rep Power: 8 |
Quote:
|
||
August 27, 2021, 02:48 |
|
#6 |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: N/A
Posts: 50
Rep Power: 12 |
Does anyone have an explanation for the results in v6? One gets actually the same "bad" result in v2106.
|
|
January 7, 2022, 12:41 |
|
#7 |
Member
Amirreza Niazmehr
Join Date: Nov 2018
Posts: 40
Rep Power: 7 |
Hi dear Brandani
I would appreciate if you could answer my question. Actually I'm using SandiaD_LTS test case, but the time unite which OpenFOAM is using does not make sense me at all. Is the unite of time in second? Because in the default setting, 'end time' is set to 1500, but this time for combustion (injection) is not a reasonable value ! In combustion the time is ususallly in millisecond scale. Do you have probably any Idea about time units in Openfoam, specially by using this start time and end time and also Delta T. In attachment you can also find the picture of the ControlDict.orig file. Thanks alot in advance |
|
January 18, 2022, 02:10 |
Sandia Flame D OpenFoam tutorial case - bad result?
|
#8 |
Senior Member
abdikerim kurbanaliev
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Kyrgyzstan, Osh
Posts: 121
Rep Power: 16 |
All quantities in OpenFOAM should be in SI system of unit.
|
|
January 18, 2022, 14:29 |
|
#9 |
Senior Member
|
End time 1500 here refers to the maximal number of time steps (intended as number of iterations).
The value to the time step (or time increment) in controlled by the PIMPLE dictionary inside system/fvSolution |
|
Tags |
combustion, reactingfoam, sandiad |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Frequently Asked Questions about Installing OpenFOAM | wyldckat | OpenFOAM Installation | 3 | November 14, 2023 12:58 |
[DesignModeler] DesignModeler Scripting: How to get Full Command Access | ANT | ANSYS Meshing & Geometry | 53 | February 16, 2020 16:13 |
fluxRequired OpenFoam Versions SimpleFoam Taylor Couette flow tutorial | mörli | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 0 | April 9, 2019 12:50 |
Free surface boudary conditions with SOLA-VOF | Fan | Main CFD Forum | 10 | September 9, 2006 13:24 |
Problems of Duns Codes! | Martin J | Main CFD Forum | 8 | August 15, 2003 00:19 |