|
[Sponsors] |
September 8, 2016, 07:15 |
Turbulent Model versus laminar in openFoam
|
#1 |
Member
annn
Join Date: Jun 2016
Posts: 40
Rep Power: 10 |
What is taken in the calculation of the result when you go from a laminar model to a turbulent model?
I am wondering if something simila happens when you switch turbulence models, for example going from k-epsilon to k-Omega you don't need the epsilon feild any more so you can delete it and openFoam won't complain |
|
September 8, 2016, 15:06 |
|
#2 |
Senior Member
Mahdi Hosseinali
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: NB, Canada
Posts: 273
Rep Power: 18 |
About how turbulence models work in OF you need to read documents, way bigger than a post in forum.
The only files needed are the input files to the method, the rest will be calculated during the simulation. For example for k-epsilon you need them both, but for k-Omega you only need k and omega. Even though epsilon is used during the solution but it will be calculated and input file is not needed. You can try this by simply changing the name of the files and do a test run to see if OF complains about a missing file or not? |
|
Tags |
laminar turbulence model |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
How to contribute to the community of OpenFOAM users and to the OpenFOAM technology | wyldckat | OpenFOAM | 17 | November 10, 2017 16:54 |
Laminar vs Turbulent Navier-Stokes | truman | Main CFD Forum | 8 | July 10, 2017 08:20 |
Combustion Model - Laminar Flamelet Model | spg1g14 | CFX | 0 | August 5, 2015 19:13 |
Convergence and model usage (laminar, turbulent) | 7R0Y | FLUENT | 0 | March 13, 2014 16:13 |
Half laminar and turbulent model trying to solve | Andrew Clarke | FLUENT | 5 | May 19, 2008 14:40 |