|
[Sponsors] |
Turbulent frequency equation for compressible kOmegaSST turbulence model |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
August 31, 2013, 11:36 |
Turbulent frequency equation for compressible kOmegaSST turbulence model
|
#1 |
New Member
Bojan Sekutkovski
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 19
Rep Power: 14 |
Hi everybody,
I have one question that concerns turbulent frequency equation in compressible kOmegaSST equation (I mean "omega equation")... There is the definition of SuSP term in Programmers Guide: SuSp(rho,phi) = rho*phi In turbulent frequency equation: fvm::SuSp ( rho_*(F1 - scalar(1))*CDkOmega/omega_, omega_ ) which (by the programmers guide) means: (rho_*(F1 - scalar(1))*CDkOmega/omega_)*omega_ My question: Why don't we simply write: rho_*(F1 - scalar(1))*CDkOmega ? Regards! |
|
September 6, 2013, 07:45 |
|
#2 |
Senior Member
Joachim Herb
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 650
Rep Power: 22 |
I guess this is part of the numeric magic of OpenFOAM:
fvm::SuSp can be used to either add a source term explicitly or implicitly to an equation depending on the sign of the factor. This can improve the stability by increasing the diagonal dominance of the matrix. See for example here: http://www.foamcfd.org/Nabla/guides/...x14-410002.4.9 |
|
Tags |
compressible komegasst, komegasst, omega, omega equation |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Wrong calculation of nut in the kOmegaSST turbulence model | FelixL | OpenFOAM Bugs | 27 | March 27, 2012 10:02 |
error message | cuteapathy | CFX | 14 | March 20, 2012 07:45 |
Zero equation turbulence model gives better result?? | Sanyo | CFX | 10 | June 26, 2011 11:58 |
Low Reynolds k-epsilon model | YJZ | ANSYS | 1 | August 20, 2010 14:57 |
Constant velocity of the material | Sas | CFX | 15 | July 13, 2010 09:56 |