|
[Sponsors] |
March 14, 2013, 08:18 |
A question on fvm::Sp(epsilon/k, k)
|
#1 |
Senior Member
Gerhard Holzinger
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Austria
Posts: 342
Rep Power: 28 |
Hello,
this is more a question of how to understand this term: Code:
fvm::Sp(epsilon/k, k) Why is this form used? Mathematically, one could also write: Code:
fvm::Sp(epsilon) |
|
March 18, 2013, 04:08 |
|
#2 |
Senior Member
Christian Lucas
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Braunschweig, Germany
Posts: 202
Rep Power: 18 |
Hi
the reason is stability of the linear equation system this would go into the source vector fvm::Sp(epsilon) and this in the matrix of the linear equation system. fvm::Sp(epsilon/k, k) Regards, Christian |
|
April 14, 2014, 21:26 |
|
#3 | |
Senior Member
Dongyue Li
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Beijing, China
Posts: 849
Rep Power: 18 |
Quote:
If this fvm::Sp(epsilon) go into the source vector, why dont we use epsilon instead? |
||
Tags |
kepsilon, source term, turbulence |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
small question about the functionalities of topological changes in OpenFoam | ngj | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 2 | February 28, 2013 11:02 |
Question Re Engineering Data Source | imnull | ANSYS | 0 | March 5, 2012 14:51 |
internal field question - PitzDaily Case | atareen64 | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 2 | January 26, 2011 16:26 |
Poisson Solver question | Suresh | Main CFD Forum | 3 | August 12, 2005 05:37 |
Philosophical CFD question | Richard Howe | Main CFD Forum | 14 | June 17, 2001 15:41 |