|
[Sponsors] |
March 4, 2013, 11:20 |
OpenFOAM wall function treatment
|
#1 |
New Member
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 12
Rep Power: 14 |
Hello there,
i have a question regarding the wall function treatment for the kOmegaSST model in OpenFOAM 2.1.x. I am using the nutUSpaldingWallFunction and i would like to know, if it's comparable to the automatic wall function treatment in CFX. Does anybody knwo that? so does the nutUSpaldingWallFunction uses a blending between lowRe and highRe? Is there another wall function available in OpenFOAM-2.1.x for the kOmegaSST turbulence model that is comparable to the automatic wall function treatment in CFX? king regards! |
|
March 4, 2013, 11:24 |
|
#2 | |
New Member
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 12
Rep Power: 14 |
Quote:
i forgot to mention: i am interested only in wall function treatment for incompressible RANS applications |
||
March 5, 2013, 14:10 |
|
#3 |
Member
Timo K.
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: University of Stuttgart
Posts: 66
Rep Power: 16 |
Yes it is a "automatic" wall function, but not comparable to that of CFX.
|
|
March 5, 2013, 17:04 |
|
#4 |
New Member
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 12
Rep Power: 14 |
thanks for replying! so it uses some kind of automatic blending to accomplish to the low- and highRe formulation of the SST-model ?
i didn't really expect that it is comparable to that one used in CFX do have any references of validation test cases for OpenFOAM that uses the Spalding wf formulation in combination with kOmegaSST ? would be nice! or maybe experiences using SST with Spalding? |
|
September 4, 2013, 09:23 |
|
#5 |
Senior Member
Joachim Herb
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 650
Rep Power: 22 |
||
September 4, 2013, 10:06 |
|
#6 |
Senior Member
Ehsan
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Iran
Posts: 2,208
Rep Power: 27 |
is there an article about mutUSpaldingWallFunction?
__________________
Injustice Anywhere is a Threat for Justice Everywhere.Martin Luther King. To Be or Not To Be,Thats the Question! The Only Stupid Question Is the One that Goes Unasked. |
|
September 4, 2013, 19:10 |
|
#7 |
Senior Member
Joachim Herb
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 650
Rep Power: 22 |
This is the original paper:
B. E. Launder and D. B. Spalding. The Numerical Computation of Turbulent Flows. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 3:269-289, 1974. (I didn't find it online) Perhaps this helps: http://www.tfd.chalmers.se/~lada/pos..._report_WF.pdf |
|
March 6, 2015, 13:52 |
|
#8 | |
New Member
Frans Visscher
Join Date: Dec 2014
Posts: 2
Rep Power: 0 |
Quote:
Last edited by FransVisscher; March 16, 2015 at 06:14. |
||
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Very technical question about solving wall boundary layer ... | jlb001 | FLUENT | 6 | December 27, 2014 06:56 |
Wall Function in OpenFOAM 1.5 dev | enry | OpenFOAM | 0 | March 3, 2010 07:14 |
Wall treatment : Wall function vs Fine mesh | Gearb0x | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 4 | January 26, 2010 17:09 |
DecomposePar links against liblamso0 with OpenMPI | jens_klostermann | OpenFOAM Bugs | 11 | June 28, 2007 18:51 |
[blockMesh] Axisymmetrical mesh | Rasmus Gjesing (Gjesing) | OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion | 10 | April 2, 2007 15:00 |