|
[Sponsors] |
September 13, 2007, 03:53 |
Hello everyone,
I have cre
|
#1 |
Member
Prashant Ojha
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 38
Rep Power: 17 |
Hello everyone,
I have created a mesh which has about 6 volumes, each having various inlet and wall patches. There are interfaces created due to mesh generation which were defined under defaultFace, and were assigned a boundary type of Empty. Now, I am working with 3D and I cannot define defaultFaces as "empty". Is there a "interface" or similar boundary condition? I am not sure, but can I use the "stitchMesh" utility? |
|
September 17, 2007, 14:51 |
If the internal faces joining
|
#2 |
Senior Member
Srinath Madhavan (a.k.a pUl|)
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Edmonton, AB, Canada
Posts: 703
Rep Power: 21 |
If the internal faces joining the 6 volumes exactly overlap each other then there is no need for extra definition when using blockMesh. It automatically understands that those are internal faces. So there is no need to define them explicitly as boundaries of a certain type. I am assuming that the 6 volumes join together to form a single fluid domain.
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Boundary condition | bltu | CFX | 4 | February 5, 2008 18:15 |
Boundary condition for UDS | Tomik | FLUENT | 0 | December 5, 2006 18:37 |
Boundary condition of the third kind or Danckwertz boundary condition | plage | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 4 | October 3, 2006 13:21 |
Slip Boundary Condition for Moving Boundary | Shukla | Main CFD Forum | 3 | November 11, 2005 16:02 |
Which boundary condition is better? Please help. | Sam | Main CFD Forum | 1 | May 12, 2005 15:03 |