CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > OpenFOAM > OpenFOAM Pre-Processing

k and omega values for 2D input simpleFoam

Register Blogs Community New Posts Updated Threads Search

Like Tree1Likes
  • 1 Post By kandelabr

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   July 18, 2018, 05:37
Default k and omega values for 2D input simpleFoam
  #1
New Member
 
Alberto Rinaldi
Join Date: Jul 2018
Posts: 5
Rep Power: 8
rinaldialberto is on a distinguished road
Hi there,

I am approaching to run a 2D simulation of a profile. I initialize the flow with simpleFoam and then use steady-state fields as initialization for pimpleFoam.

My question is how to calculate k and omega at inlet for simpleFoam.

Experimental data are:
  • Airspeed U=13.33 m/s
    Turbulence intensity I= 0,003
    Wind tunnel sizes Lx=4m, Ly= 4m (hydraulic diameter dh=4m)

Should I use the values as for a 3D simulation?
k=3/2*(U*I)^2= 0.00239
omega=sqrt(k)/L=sqrt(k)/(0.038*dh)=0.32

do these values make sense for a 2D simulation?

Thanks
Alberto
rinaldialberto is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   August 2, 2018, 03:47
Default
  #2
Senior Member
 
kandelabr's Avatar
 
Nejc
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: Slovenia
Posts: 196
Rep Power: 9
kandelabr is on a distinguished road
The numbers are the same for 2D and 3D cases:

https://cfd.direct/openfoam/user-guide/v6-cavity/
Quote:
OpenFOAM always operates in a 3 dimensional Cartesian coordinate system and all geometries are generated in 3 dimensions. OpenFOAM solves the case in 3 dimensions by default but can be instructed to solve in 2 dimensions by specifying a ‘special’ empty boundary condition on boundaries normal to the (3rd) dimension for which no solution is required.
Instead of manually calculating values, I use boundary conditions:
  • turbulentMixingLengthDissipationRateInlet for omega
  • turbulentIntensityKineticEnergyInlet for k
belier1988 likes this.
kandelabr is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Tags
2d simulation, inlet boundary condition, k-omega sst, simple foam, turbulence model


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
overshooting of Omega in SST komega using simpleFoam cm_jubayer OpenFOAM 2 June 7, 2020 13:52
Airfoil with simpleFoam and kOmegaSST: high drag values? Tsiolkovsky OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 6 November 21, 2018 06:56
oscillatingRotatingMotion: simulation time change with omega and amplitude values decibelle OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 3 November 14, 2018 07:28
SimpleFoam - ramp up values to achieve convergence AmRo OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 0 July 7, 2016 10:38
SimpleFoam converges to wrong values eruwaedhiel OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 3 July 1, 2015 04:01


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 13:17.