CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > OpenFOAM > OpenFOAM Post-Processing

LES calculation of EPSILON (turbulence dissipation)

Register Blogs Community New Posts Updated Threads Search

Like Tree1Likes
  • 1 Post By syavash

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   November 5, 2013, 22:38
Default LES calculation of EPSILON (turbulence dissipation)
  #1
New Member
 
Simon Emhardt
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 9
Rep Power: 13
Gosi is on a distinguished road
hi everybody,

I am using pisoFOAM with LES Smagorinsky model to simulate a fully developed turbulent flow in a rotating pipe.

Now i want to evaluate the turbulence dissipation epsilon.

Is is it possible to calculate or postprocess it with openfoam? Is there anyone who did some kind of postprocessing before?
Any help would be appreciated.

Simon
Gosi is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   February 21, 2014, 13:30
Default
  #2
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 52
Rep Power: 16
MaryBau is on a distinguished road
Hi Simon and everyone;

Did you find the solution to your problem?

I am also trying to calculate de dissipation of an LES simulation, but I am not getting the correct value.

I am doing a decaying isotropic turbulence, then the derivative of the energy with respect to time should be equal to my -dissipation: dE/dt=-epsilon.

If I calculate dE/dt in my simulations, my results are in agreement with a DNS simulation (A. Wray in the AGARD database). However if I calculate epsilon directly from my velocity field, it seems that I have a constant "shift" as you can see in my plot.

I am calculating my disipation as:

volSymmTensorField S(symm(fvc::grad(U)));
volScalarField epsilon=2*(nu+nuSgs)*(S && S); #epsilon total

Any suggestions or ideas of what I might be doing wrong ? Am I missing something?

Thanks for your help and have a nice day,

Mary
Attached Files
File Type: pdf calculatedEdt.pdf (23.3 KB, 369 views)
MaryBau is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   October 21, 2014, 17:29
Default
  #3
New Member
 
sebastien vilfayeau
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 14
Rep Power: 14
sebastien_F1 is on a distinguished road
Hi MaryBau,

Did you get a chance to get it working? I'm also trying to calculate the resolved dissipation rate and it's off by a factor 2 or 3.

Thanks
Sebastien
sebastien_F1 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   October 23, 2014, 09:58
Default
  #4
New Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 21
Rep Power: 13
Shahr is on a distinguished road
In general LES case, not only for decaying turbulence simulation, the correct procedure for calculating total turbulence dissipation seems to be calculating the dissipation tensor of the resolved scale, component by component, and adding it to the contribution of the sub-grid scale (this is my understanding).

The former requires having access to uPrime. When uPrime at each time step is available, one can get derivatives in corresponding directions, and then time-average the value to get one component of the resolved-scale dissipation.This must be done for each component. The procedure seems possible with the help of some additional functionObjects, and then tedious post-processing.

The latter however seems to be impossible using the output of subgrid-scale models in OpenFOAM. What can be taken out of the SGS model is only the magnitude of dissipation at SGS.

So in order to calculate dissipation correctly we have to think about solving each of the a.m. problems. If anybody has any ideas, I would be glad to discuss.
Shahr is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   July 9, 2016, 05:58
Default
  #5
Senior Member
 
Ehsan Asgari
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 473
Rep Power: 18
syavash is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shahr View Post
In general LES case, not only for decaying turbulence simulation, the correct procedure for calculating total turbulence dissipation seems to be calculating the dissipation tensor of the resolved scale, component by component, and adding it to the contribution of the sub-grid scale (this is my understanding).

The former requires having access to uPrime. When uPrime at each time step is available, one can get derivatives in corresponding directions, and then time-average the value to get one component of the resolved-scale dissipation.This must be done for each component. The procedure seems possible with the help of some additional functionObjects, and then tedious post-processing.

The latter however seems to be impossible using the output of subgrid-scale models in OpenFOAM. What can be taken out of the SGS model is only the magnitude of dissipation at SGS.

So in order to calculate dissipation correctly we have to think about solving each of the a.m. problems. If anybody has any ideas, I would be glad to discuss.
Hi,

Did you find a way to calculate TKE dissipation?!

Thanks
milena likes this.
syavash is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
SimpleFoam k and epsilon bounded nedved OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 16 March 4, 2017 09:30
Turbulence dampening due to magnetic field in LES and RAS eelcovv OpenFOAM 0 June 8, 2010 12:35
Estimate turbulence dissipation rate (epsilon) blackbody Main CFD Forum 1 May 12, 2010 19:54
problems with a LES incompressible calculation (pisoFoam) laurencep OpenFOAM 2 April 22, 2010 05:53
SimpleFoam k and epsilon bounded nedved OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 1 November 25, 2008 21:21


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 21:42.