|
[Sponsors] |
[snappyHexMesh] SnappyHexMesh parametric sweep study |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
February 11, 2024, 09:23 |
SnappyHexMesh parametric sweep study
|
#1 |
Member
Tuomo Keskitalo
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 57
Rep Power: 16 |
Hello snappyHexMesh users,
I've been working on a kind of sensitivity analysis of pretty much all SnappyHexMesh (openfoam.com v2312) parameters and mesh quality criteria, in an attempt to evaluate the effect of different Snappy parameters on the result mesh. The study is based on visual analysis of the result mesh, layer coverages reported by Snappy, and the checkMesh results about mesh errors. I'm using the OpenFOAM motorBike (with clean-up and minor modifications) as the test geometry, as it really poses a challenge for an automatic meshing tool. My subjective analysis of the results is here, along with the links to the background info, code, result image and videos. Feel free to comment on the results and my analysis in this thread. Thanks! BR, Tuomo |
|
August 6, 2024, 12:41 |
|
#2 |
Member
Tuomo Keskitalo
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 57
Rep Power: 16 |
FYI as a result of this work, I've generated a template setup for SnappyHexMesh (for openfoam.com version). Feel free to try it out!
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
parametric study with slurm script | little_fish | OpenFOAM Pre-Processing | 0 | June 22, 2023 09:59 |
Parameter/Geometry sweep study in STAR-CCM+ | Seervan | STAR-CCM+ | 6 | November 1, 2017 23:06 |
Parametric study by Ansys Workbench | Sahar FaPerhu | ANSYS | 17 | August 23, 2017 04:29 |
Problem with Parametric Study | Picopico | CFX | 1 | March 7, 2017 18:56 |
parametric study with design modeler and icepak | aminem | ANSYS | 3 | May 21, 2014 06:11 |