|
[Sponsors] |
[snappyHexMesh] Meshing a STL file which has holes |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
May 13, 2019, 04:21 |
Meshing a STL file which has holes
|
#1 |
Member
Owais Shabbir
Join Date: May 2019
Posts: 48
Rep Power: 7 |
Dear Forum people,
I am new to meshing on snappyHexMesh. Currently, I am trying to mesh a protecting case of batteries. It contains a lot holes of diameter 7mm. I have tried changing the level of refinements and also a few other parameters to increase the refinement around the holes to achieve a circular refinement but as you can see the holes in the attached picture, they always have a non-circular shape. I chose the snappyHexMeshDict file from the snappyMultiRegionHeater meshing tutorial and set the case according to my geometry. Any help would be appreciated. |
|
May 13, 2019, 09:47 |
|
#2 |
Senior Member
anonymous
Join Date: Jan 2016
Posts: 416
Rep Power: 14 |
Hi!
It seems like if you loaded the castellated mesh not the snapped one. Check how many timesteps do you have. If you have anything else not just a 0 folder, you have to check the last time in paraview or you will see the castellated mesh (by default 0 time is skipped). If you have this problem you can solve it by using the -overwrite switch in snappyHexMesh so you will overwrite your mesh at the 0 time. If you don't have more timesteps, check if the snappying is enabled in the snappyHexMeshDict (at the begining of the file). |
|
May 14, 2019, 08:33 |
|
#3 |
Member
Owais Shabbir
Join Date: May 2019
Posts: 48
Rep Power: 7 |
Hi,
I checked and it is turned on. I am thinking maybe there is a new entity that I might have to introduce to refine the hole regions. Btw just to clarify this is a solid present in the domain, I am meshing the flow domain around this solid. This is the SHMDict that I am using, may be you can pick which entity should be improved/added. Code:
castellatedMesh true; snap true; addLayers false; geometry { topcover { type triSurfaceMesh; file "topcover.stl"; } refinementBox {type searchableBox; min (-0.02 -0.01 -0.01); max (0.7 0.03 0.2);} }; castellatedMeshControls { maxLocalCells 500000; maxGlobalCells 5000000; minRefinementCells 10; nCellsBetweenLevels 3; features ( { file "topcover.eMesh"; level 4; } ); refinementSurfaces { topcover { level (5 5); faceZone topcover; cellZone topcover; cellZoneInside outside; } } resolveFeatureAngle 5; refinementRegions { // refinementBox // { // mode inside; // levels ((1E15 1)); //} } locationInMesh (-0.1 -0.1 -0.25); allowFreeStandingZoneFaces true; } snapControls { nSmoothPatch 3; tolerance 4.0; nSolveIter 30; nRelaxIter 5; nFeatureSnapIter 15; implicitFeautureSnap false; explicitFeatureSnap true; multiRegionFeatureSnap false; } addLayersControls { relativeSizes true; { topcover { nSurfaceLayers 3; } } expansionRatio 1.3; finalLayerThickness 0.02; minThickness 0.01; nGrow 1; featureAngle 80; nRelaxIter 3; nSmoothSurfaceNormals 1; nSmoothNormals 3; nSmoothThickness 2; maxFaceThicknessRatio 0.5; maxThicknessToMedialRatio 1; minMedianAxisAngle 90; nBufferCellsNoExtrude 0; nLayerIter 50; } meshQualityControls { #include "meshQualityDict" } ce needs to be higher than this. mergeTolerance 1e-6; I have removed the comments so it is clear and concise to be read. |
|
Tags |
holes, mesh around holes, snappyhesmeshdict, snappyhexmesh |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
[OpenFOAM.org] Patches to compile OpenFOAM 2.2 on Mac OS X | gschaider | OpenFOAM Installation | 136 | October 10, 2017 18:25 |
[swak4Foam] groovyBC in openFOAM-2.0 for parabolic velocity bc | ofslcm | OpenFOAM Community Contributions | 25 | March 6, 2017 11:03 |
"parabolicVelocity" in OpenFoam 2.1.0 ? | sawyer86 | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 21 | February 7, 2012 12:44 |
ParaView Compilation | jakaranda | OpenFOAM Installation | 3 | October 27, 2008 12:46 |
DecomposePar links against liblamso0 with OpenMPI | jens_klostermann | OpenFOAM Bugs | 11 | June 28, 2007 18:51 |