CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > OpenFOAM > OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion

[snappyHexMesh] snappyHexMesh cannot achieve smooth surface from stl

Register Blogs Community New Posts Updated Threads Search

Like Tree2Likes
  • 1 Post By fra76
  • 1 Post By alex::cfd

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   October 21, 2018, 07:33
Default snappyHexMesh cannot achieve smooth surface from stl
  #1
New Member
 
Alex
Join Date: Sep 2018
Posts: 4
Rep Power: 8
alex::cfd is on a distinguished road
Hi all,

I use the coarse blockmesh and refine at stl surface approach explained in the userguide section 4.4. to place a wing section into a domain.

In principle, meshing works.
However, although the pointed trailing edge gets meshed fine, the round leading edge is awkward.

Here is the leading edge in the CAD program (actually blender):


The result looks like:



I found that increasing refinement levels from 4 to 7 increases quality:


This however is still unsatisfactory.

The geometry of the stl used as input looks well, wehn viewd in paraFoam.
Can I visualize the result of surfaceFeatureExtract somehow to see if the result is Ok?

One difference compared to the trailing edge is that the leading edge is resolved by much more points in the stl. Could this be a problem?

How can I achieve a more round shape at the tip? Any hints?

Thx
Alex
Attached Images
File Type: png snapshot115.png (5.7 KB, 172 views)
File Type: png snapshot114.png (31.3 KB, 169 views)
File Type: png snapshot112.png (19.2 KB, 167 views)
alex::cfd is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   October 22, 2018, 01:19
Default
  #2
Senior Member
 
Francesco Del Citto
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Zürich Area, Switzerland
Posts: 237
Rep Power: 18
fra76 is on a distinguished road
Hi, Alex,

To me, it looks like you have to refine your mesh where the curvature is higher.
Try to give a max refinement level higher than the min one and, if needed, play with the resolveFeatureAngle parameter.

Hope this helps,
Francesco
Yanagi likes this.
fra76 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   October 22, 2018, 13:39
Default
  #3
New Member
 
Alex
Join Date: Sep 2018
Posts: 4
Rep Power: 8
alex::cfd is on a distinguished road
Hi,
yes, I tried that (actually spend the whole day trying to optimize parameters).
The route to success was recognizing that mesh quality control might render settings ineffective.
-> 1st disable all mesh quality contol. then get the parameters correct and then bit by bit turn on the quality control again.
Yanagi likes this.
alex::cfd is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
[Gmsh] Extrude stl surface for building a prismatic layer KateEisenhower OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion 12 April 21, 2016 17:54
[snappyHexMesh] Problem with snappyhexMesh: modelling a pore chamber and pore throat model Saideep OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion 5 May 10, 2015 15:46
[snappyHexMesh] SnappyHexMesh no layers and no decent mesh for complex geometry pizzaspinate OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion 1 February 25, 2015 08:05
[snappyHexMesh] Snap Precision to a STL Surface malaboss OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion 16 July 26, 2013 02:44
Structured or unstructured meshing of a STL file (surface) Milad06 Pointwise & Gridgen 4 April 25, 2013 12:55


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 16:51.