|
[Sponsors] |
[Gmsh] gMsh instead of blockMesh for base mesh, then snappyHexMesh |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
February 23, 2017, 13:00 |
gMsh instead of blockMesh for base mesh, then snappyHexMesh
|
#1 |
New Member
YongQiang Chi
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 14
Rep Power: 16 |
Hi:
Maybe it is not a new thing anyways. I recently has a small discovery using gMsh instead of blockMesh to generate the base mesh for snappyHexMesh in OF. -- And it works. just generate a simple gMsh (full hex mesh) and save as a single volume. Then gmshToFoam to general a mesh in polyMesh. Then run snappyHexMesh on top of it, which usually works. The benefit of using gMsh instead of blockMesh is that it has more control over blockMesh, it can specify some level of variation or refinement in the basemesh. Now you needs less levels of refinements on snappyHexMesh, so the time and mesh quality to the final meshing result can be improved. I don't have any pics, but you guys can try this out. Anther hind may be: you can create a basemesh basically in any meshing tool and snap on top of it --- as long as it comes out with a simple hex mesh. I haven't try other tools but I guess it should work in the same way |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
[snappyHexMesh] problem with snappyHexMesh | kanes | OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion | 10 | January 26, 2016 07:11 |
[mesh manipulation] Importing Multiple Meshes | thomasnwalshiii | OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion | 18 | December 19, 2015 19:57 |
[OpenFOAM] snappyHexMesh - can't open mesh in ParaView | tfigueiro | ParaView | 0 | June 11, 2015 20:05 |
[Gmsh] gmshToFoam problem: not the same mesh in Gmsh vs. paraview | zhernadi | OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion | 8 | July 7, 2011 03:28 |
[snappyHexMesh] SnappyHexMesh not generate mesh first time | mavimo | OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion | 4 | August 26, 2008 08:08 |