CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > OpenFOAM > OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion

[snappyHexMesh] snappyHexMesh: extra domains domain1 domain2 ... appear

Register Blogs Community New Posts Updated Threads Search

Like Tree1Likes
  • 1 Post By Quin404

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   May 27, 2014, 14:42
Default snappyHexMesh: extra domains domain1 domain2 ... appear
  #1
Member
 
Sergey
Join Date: Nov 2013
Posts: 87
Rep Power: 13
skuznet is on a distinguished road
Hello!

I'm trying to generate a mesh for conjugate heat transfer using snappyHexMesh utility.
I have two stl files for fluid and solid geometries where various patches including fluid_to_solid and solid_to_fluid are defined.

When I run snappyHexMesh I get a number of domains called
domain1
domain2
...
etc

instead of just two domain solid and fluid.

Does anyone have an idea what is going wrong?

Thank you!

************************************************** **********
it looks like there are some problems with the surface, the surfaceCheck utility says that

Code:
sergkuznet@ubuntu:/media/ubuntu/run/UCcases/UCsideOptShort_run/constant/triSurface$ surfaceCheck fluid.stl
/*---------------------------------------------------------------------------*\
| =========                 |                                                 |
| \\      /  F ield         | OpenFOAM: The Open Source CFD Toolbox           |
|  \\    /   O peration     | Version:  2.2.x                                 |
|   \\  /    A nd           | Web:      www.OpenFOAM.org                      |
|    \\/     M anipulation  |                                                 |
\*---------------------------------------------------------------------------*/
Build  : 2.2.x-37940e0cd1ae
Exec   : surfaceCheck fluid.stl
Date   : May 27 2014
Time   : 23:30:17
Host   : "ubuntu"
PID    : 5557
Case   : /media/ubuntu/run/UCcases/UCsideOptShort_run/constant/triSurface
nProcs : 1
sigFpe : Enabling floating point exception trapping (FOAM_SIGFPE).
fileModificationChecking : Monitoring run-time modified files using timeStampMaster
allowSystemOperations : Disallowing user-supplied system call operations

// * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * //
Reading surface from "fluid.stl" ...

Statistics:
Triangles    : 5270
Vertices     : 2491
Bounding Box : (-0.002424 -0.00101 -0.000606) (0.004848 0.001414 0.003838)

Region	Size
------	----
fluid_to_solid	4878
maxX	2
minX	2
maxY	168
minY	12
maxZ	96
minZ	112


Surface has no illegal triangles.

Triangle quality (equilateral=1, collapsed=0):
    0 .. 0.05  : 0.232827
    0.05 .. 0.1  : 0.0757116
    0.1 .. 0.15  : 0.0538899
    0.15 .. 0.2  : 0.0724858
    0.2 .. 0.25  : 0.103226
    0.25 .. 0.3  : 0.0242884
    0.3 .. 0.35  : 0.0616698
    0.35 .. 0.4  : 0.0390892
    0.4 .. 0.45  : 0.0180266
    0.45 .. 0.5  : 0.0242884
    0.5 .. 0.55  : 0.059203
    0.55 .. 0.6  : 0.0440228
    0.6 .. 0.65  : 0.027704
    0.65 .. 0.7  : 0.0163188
    0.7 .. 0.75  : 0.0129032
    0.75 .. 0.8  : 0.0178368
    0.8 .. 0.85  : 0.00227704
    0.85 .. 0.9  : 0.0366224
    0.9 .. 0.95  : 0.0377609
    0.95 .. 1  : 0.0398482

    min 3.65063e-05 for triangle 3175
    max 0.999997 for triangle 1354

Edges:
    min 5.32471e-05 for edge 192 points (0.001616 -0.00101 0.00277059)(0.00159507 -0.00101 0.00272163)
    max 0.00506211 for edge 7488 points (0.004848 0.001414 0.003838)(0.004848 -0.00101 -0.000606)

Checking for points less than 1e-6 of bounding box ((0.007272 0.002424 0.004444) meter) apart.
Found 0 nearby points.

Surface is not closed since not all edges connected to two faces:
    connected to one face : 18
    connected to >2 faces : 0
Conflicting face labels:18
Dumping conflicting face labels to "problemFaces"
Paste this into the input for surfaceSubset

Number of unconnected parts : 1

Number of zones (connected area with consistent normal) : 1


End

I prepared parts of this surface in salome and then named them and joined together manually and they looked ok visually. I did open surface in HelyxOS and surface looked ok, but when I open it in meshlab i can see several large holes in my surface (if I open separate parts, before they were joined, there are no holes).
I guess it might be due to intersecting surfaces?
What do I do with this? Any suggestions?

I tried to run surfaceClean but it didn't help and I'm not sure which parameters to use - minlength, min quality/


************************************************** ************************************************** ************
I used
https://netfabb.azurewebsites.net/
to fix my surfaces.


no surfaceCheck says

Code:
sergkuznet@ubuntu:/media/ubuntu/run/UCcases/UCsideOptShort_run/constant/triSurface$ surfaceCheck solid.stl
/*---------------------------------------------------------------------------*\
| =========                 |                                                 |
| \\      /  F ield         | OpenFOAM: The Open Source CFD Toolbox           |
|  \\    /   O peration     | Version:  2.2.x                                 |
|   \\  /    A nd           | Web:      www.OpenFOAM.org                      |
|    \\/     M anipulation  |                                                 |
\*---------------------------------------------------------------------------*/
Build  : 2.2.x-37940e0cd1ae
Exec   : surfaceCheck solid.stl
Date   : May 28 2014
Time   : 10:52:13
Host   : "ubuntu"
PID    : 9647
Case   : /media/ubuntu/run/UCcases/UCsideOptShort_run/constant/triSurface
nProcs : 1
sigFpe : Enabling floating point exception trapping (FOAM_SIGFPE).
fileModificationChecking : Monitoring run-time modified files using timeStampMaster
allowSystemOperations : Disallowing user-supplied system call operations

// * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * //
Reading surface from "solid.stl" ...

Statistics:
Triangles    : 4776
Vertices     : 2234
Bounding Box : (-2e-06 -0.00201 -0.000606) (0.002424 0.001414 0.003836)

Region	Size
------	----
patch0	4776


Surface has no illegal triangles.

Triangle quality (equilateral=1, collapsed=0):
    0 .. 0.05  : 0.210008
    0.05 .. 0.1  : 0.0822864
    0.1 .. 0.15  : 0.0527638
    0.15 .. 0.2  : 0.0728643
    0.2 .. 0.25  : 0.0768425
    0.25 .. 0.3  : 0.0249162
    0.3 .. 0.35  : 0.0464824
    0.35 .. 0.4  : 0.0456449
    0.4 .. 0.45  : 0.0303601
    0.45 .. 0.5  : 0.0276382
    0.5 .. 0.55  : 0.0406198
    0.55 .. 0.6  : 0.0406198
    0.6 .. 0.65  : 0.0372697
    0.65 .. 0.7  : 0.00942211
    0.7 .. 0.75  : 0.0247069
    0.75 .. 0.8  : 0.0500419
    0.8 .. 0.85  : 0.00439698
    0.85 .. 0.9  : 0.0316164
    0.9 .. 0.95  : 0.0450168
    0.95 .. 1  : 0.0464824

    min 4.18994e-06 for triangle 2236
    max 0.99973 for triangle 4741

Edges:
    min 1.99996e-06 for edge 3492 points (0.000404 0.000808 -0.000534)(0.000404 0.000806 -0.000534)
    max 0.00185613 for edge 3582 points (0.002114 -0.00101 0.000222)(0.000258 -0.00101 0.0002)

Checking for points less than 1e-6 of bounding box ((0.002426 0.003424 0.004442) meter) apart.
Found 0 nearby points.

Surface is closed. All edges connected to two faces.

Number of unconnected parts : 1

Number of zones (connected area with consistent normal) : 1


End

so looks that my surface is ok now, however, I lost all my surface definitions, so can't apply BC, and
when I run snappyHexMesh it still creates a number of spurious domains
domain1
domain2
....

Last edited by skuznet; May 28, 2014 at 12:17. Reason: addition
skuznet is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   September 29, 2015, 10:08
Default
  #2
New Member
 
Thomas
Join Date: Sep 2015
Posts: 3
Rep Power: 11
Quin404 is on a distinguished road
Hello!

Sorry I understand this thread is a little old now, however did you manage to find a solution to the problem, as I have been having the same issue?

Thank you
Quin404 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   November 27, 2015, 09:07
Default
  #3
New Member
 
Thomas
Join Date: Sep 2015
Posts: 3
Rep Power: 11
Quin404 is on a distinguished road
Thought it would best to let people know that I did find the issue to my problem some time ago...

I had multiple components under the same part name in the same ".stl" file.

For example, I had 10 Heat pads all in different locations, essentially having 10 different solid domains, but had defined them under the same part - "HeatPads".

So I had to rename them as individual parts, e.g. HeatPad1, HeatPad2 etc and export them as individual ".stl" files.

This then removed the random domain names

(Sorry, I do understand this was a very basic mistake!)
wyldckat likes this.
Quin404 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   November 29, 2015, 07:43
Default
  #4
Retired Super Moderator
 
Bruno Santos
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Lisbon, Portugal
Posts: 10,981
Blog Entries: 45
Rep Power: 128
wyldckat is a name known to allwyldckat is a name known to allwyldckat is a name known to allwyldckat is a name known to allwyldckat is a name known to allwyldckat is a name known to all
To add to Quin404's answer, I'll quote from openfoamwiki.net: http://openfoamwiki.net/index.php/Sn...-region_meshes
Quote:
Instructions on how to remove an external unwanted region: Background Mesh in snappy with multi domain (CHT) post #3
  • Note: this happens whenever the base mesh doesn't coincide with the outer limits of the target surface geometry. The tutorial heatTransfer/chtMultiRegionFoam/snappyMultiRegionHeater is such an example where the outside of the original STL files coincides with the base mesh.
wyldckat is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
[mesh manipulation] why splitMeshRegions creates extra domains? skuznet OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion 10 May 31, 2022 06:54
[snappyHexMesh] snappyHexMesh .stl generate extra boundary gsq OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion 0 April 21, 2018 07:03
[snappyHexMesh] MultiRegions: Snappy creates extra domains between Regions Cartuns11 OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion 3 January 22, 2018 09:39
[snappyHexMesh] Small domains in multi-region SnappyHexMesh nusivares OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion 3 August 22, 2017 11:14
chtMultiRegionSimpleFoam: crash on parallel run student666 OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 3 April 20, 2017 12:05


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 14:09.