|
[Sponsors] |
[snappyHexMesh] SHM RAM and -parallel proplem |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
May 16, 2014, 12:50 |
SHM RAM and -parallel proplem
|
#1 |
New Member
Join Date: Mar 2014
Posts: 9
Rep Power: 12 |
Hi,
I'm relative new to openFOAM but I managed to get a working snappyHexMeshDict and now I'm trying to get a better resolution at my geometry. So that the round parts are more segmented in the final net. (It's a round air-foil, shaped like a ring). With the previous refinement levels it wasn't enough refined. So now I have 2 problems. First of all I have an RAM/Swap Issue. I put the refinement level to 8 which actually worked. Then I put it up to 9 and the increased need of memory crashed the PC's. (5, 8 and 16 GB RAM + 4 GB Swap). I played with various parameters but hadn't any success to get very clean shape of my geometry. Any suggestions how I can trim my snappyHexMeshDict file? Code:
FoamFile { version 2.0; format ascii; root ""; case ""; instance ""; local ""; class dictionary; object autoHexMeshDict; } // Which of the steps to run castellatedMesh true; snap true; addLayers true; geometry { hull.stl { type triSurfaceMesh; name DIFUSOR; regions { OBJECT { name difusorHull; } } } refinementBox { type searchableBox; min (-0.50 -1.25 0); max (2 1.25 2.8); } }; // Settings for the castellatedMesh generation. castellatedMeshControls { maxLocalCells 10000000; //Max cells pro CPU maxGlobalCells 10000000; //Max overall cells minRefinementCells 50; //Loopbreaker if the to refine cells are less than this Number nCellsBetweenLevels 1; //Defines the refinement of one level features ({file "hull.eMesh"; level 0;}); refinementSurfaces { DIFUSOR { level (6 9); } } resolveFeatureAngle 30; //Refinement if some FeatureAngle is higher than this refinementRegions { refinementBox { mode inside; levels ((0.1 3)); } DIFUSOR { mode distance; levels ((0.02 9) (0.6 8) (0.2 7)); } } locationInMesh (8 8 0.5); //Snappy meshing inside or outside a model allowFreeStandingZoneFaces false; } // Settings for the snapping. snapControls { nSmoothPatch 8; // presmoothing iterations before correspondence is set tolerance 1.0; // relative distance the program searches for snappoints nSolveIter 80; // how often do snapiterations bigger-->better-->longer nRelaxIter 5; // remove bad meshpoints. Should end before reaching value implicitFeatureSnap false; // using surfaceFeatureExtract Method(generates eMesh) } // Settings for the layer addition. addLayersControls { layers { difusorHull { nSurfaceLayers 6; } } relativeSizes true; expansionRatio 1.15; finalLayerThickness 0.2; minThickness 0.1; nGrow 1; // Advanced Setting featureAngle 30; nRelaxIter 5; nSmoothSurfaceNormals 1; nSmoothNormals 3; nSmoothThickness 10; maxFaceThicknessRatio 0.5; maxThicknessToMedialRatio 0.3; minMedianAxisAngle 80; nBufferCellsNoExtrude 0; nLayerIter 50; nRelaxedIter 20; } meshQualityControls { maxNonOrtho 65; maxBoundarySkewness 20; maxInternalSkewness 4; maxConcave 80; minVol 1e-13; minTetQuality 1e-9; minFlatness 0.5; minArea -1; minTwist 0.05; minDeterminant 0.001; minFaceWeight 0.05; minVolRatio 0.01; minTriangleTwist -1; nSmoothScale 4; errorReduction 0.75; relaxed { } } // Advanced // Flags for optional output debug 0; mergeTolerance 1e-6; Code:
mpirun --hostfile system/machines -np 4 snappyHexMesh -parallel > meshLog Code:
[NameOfServer:22784] Error: unknown option "--daemonize" I also checked if I can access to every server without verification and that worked. May I initialise OpenFOAM incorrectly or I use the mpirun wrong? Last edited by Heremus; May 21, 2014 at 09:50. |
|
June 11, 2014, 08:52 |
ram
|
#2 |
New Member
Calum Douglas
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Coventry, UK
Posts: 26
Rep Power: 13 |
well firstly if you want very high refinement, but dont have enough RAM - you cant do it. You`ll have to just use lower refinement levels.
However you have set you max cell count as identical for both CPU and entire case. Which isnt very good as the CPU will run out of cells and stop refinement before anything else happens. As a rough guide you should divide total system ram by # cores and use that as a ratio. Ie. if you have 16gb RAM with 8 cores, you have 2gb per core. Hence your max cell count total should be 8x higher than the max cell count per cpu. Right now you have 10 million cells as max for BOTH each core AND the total solution. maxLocalCells 10000000; maxGlobalCells 10000000; I have no idea how much total ram you have but, I would change it for example to something like this (if you have 4 cores for example) maxLocalCells 4000000; maxGlobalCells 16000000;
__________________
Calum Douglas Director Scorpion Dynamics Ltd Email: calum.douglas@scorpion-dynamics.com Web: www.scorpion-dynamics.com |
|
June 26, 2014, 12:10 |
|
#3 |
New Member
Join Date: Mar 2014
Posts: 9
Rep Power: 12 |
Cool thank you for your help!
I tried your settings but unfortunately it requires so much more space than before that it nearly crashed instantly. And I have 4 cores and 16 Gb of RAM I will try if there is an 0 to much in the maxLocalCells but then it's 40x. |
|
June 26, 2014, 14:10 |
refinement
|
#4 |
New Member
Calum Douglas
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Coventry, UK
Posts: 26
Rep Power: 13 |
Your refinement levels are incredibly high.
levels ((0.02 9) (0.6 8) (0.2 7)) If you`ve only got 16gb ram, and the model is large - you will have to lower those or you`ll never mesh it. If you want to do more, you`ll have to buy more ram. I`ve got 32GB and wish I had twice that.... you`ll just have to try something like levels ((0.02 4) (0.6 3) (0.2 2)) and work upwards until you reach the limit of your machine.
__________________
Calum Douglas Director Scorpion Dynamics Ltd Email: calum.douglas@scorpion-dynamics.com Web: www.scorpion-dynamics.com |
|
Tags |
mpirun, openfoam, parallel computation, snappyhexmesh |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Huge increase of RAM makes parallel mpirun fails | choch | OpenFOAM | 2 | November 12, 2018 11:42 |
[snappyHexMesh] Snappyhexmesh parallel using all RAM | snowygrouch | OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion | 2 | May 29, 2014 17:57 |
ECC vs. non ECC ram: My opinion | ghost82 | Hardware | 19 | February 13, 2014 10:32 |
New workstation for different usage scenarios - CPU and RAM | natem | Hardware | 6 | August 7, 2013 03:47 |
Messhing in Parallel: CPU <5% Ram > 90% Allrun Sleeping | stark22 | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 0 | December 2, 2012 11:28 |