|
[Sponsors] |
January 4, 2014, 12:57 |
Smoothing the surface
|
#1 |
Super Moderator
Tobias Holzmann
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Bad Wörishofen
Posts: 2,711
Blog Entries: 6
Rep Power: 52 |
Dear all,
I am working with sHM a long time but I never solved the following problem! If I am using multi-region cases I got bad surface approximation on curved surfaces (see the attached pictures). If I mesh just one region - everything is fine. Does someone know any solutions for this? I think this depend on the multi-domain function of sHM. Maybe it happend after splitting the mesh?! Regards Tobi |
|
January 4, 2014, 19:24 |
|
#2 |
Senior Member
|
But can you exactly post what is the problem? Wasn't able to figure out it from the pictures you've attached.
|
|
January 5, 2014, 13:32 |
|
#3 | |
Super Moderator
Tobias Holzmann
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Bad Wörishofen
Posts: 2,711
Blog Entries: 6
Rep Power: 52 |
Quote:
Hi, the problem - maybe its not a problem - is that the surface is not smooth enough. If I just mesh the cup region then I get a extreme accurate surface approximation. If I am home again I will do this again and post a new picture so that the differences are clear. To clear it up: - one region: accurate and smooth surface - multi region: no smooth surface (see pictures) - snatchy surface. Regards Tobi |
||
January 5, 2014, 18:10 |
|
#4 |
Super Moderator
Tobias Holzmann
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Bad Wörishofen
Posts: 2,711
Blog Entries: 6
Rep Power: 52 |
Okay.
In the attachment you find the surfaces after meshing but just the cup (no multidomain with cellZones and faceZones). The question now. Is it possible to get such a surface with the multidomain meshing too or not? Regards Tobi |
|
January 9, 2014, 04:53 |
|
#5 |
New Member
Michael
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 23
Rep Power: 14 |
I do not know where these issues come from, but I was able to fix it by trying different mesh settings.
You have to play with the values: nSolveIter, nRelaxIter, nFeatureSnapIter. explicitFeatureSnap true and multiRegionFeatureSnap false did a better job for me than implicitFeatureSnap. Furthermore the meshQualityControls may have an influence on the result. As a starting point you may use my settings: Code:
snapControls { nSmoothPatch 3; tolerance 1.0; nSolveIter 60; nRelaxIter 5; nFeatureSnapIter 5; implicitFeatureSnap false; explicitFeatureSnap true; multiRegionFeatureSnap false; } Code:
meshQualityControls { maxNonOrtho 100; maxBoundarySkewness 40; maxInternalSkewness 8; maxConcave 80; minVol 0; minTetQuality 1e-30; minArea -1; minTwist 0.02; minDeterminant 0.001; minFaceWeight 0.02; minVolRatio 0.01; minTriangleTwist -1; nSmoothScale 4; errorReduction 0.75; } |
|
January 9, 2014, 09:50 |
|
#6 |
Super Moderator
Tobias Holzmann
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Bad Wörishofen
Posts: 2,711
Blog Entries: 6
Rep Power: 52 |
Hi,
I will check it out. I used explizit Feature snapping and have more iterations on smoothing as you mentioned but I will check you Settings. It only appears with multi-Region! |
|
June 4, 2018, 11:18 |
|
#7 |
Senior Member
|
Hello Tobi,
Have you figured out something to smooth surface while using SHM for multiregion meshing? I have seen your tutorials on your website for mutiregion meshing. In those tutorials, surface is not smooth. Did you face any problem in simulation due to non-smooth surface? Thank you Regards |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
[Gmsh] Error : Self intersecting surface mesh, computing intersections & Error : Impossible | velan | OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion | 3 | October 22, 2015 12:05 |
[snappyHexMesh] SnappyHexMesh no layers and no decent mesh for complex geometry | pizzaspinate | OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion | 1 | February 25, 2015 08:05 |
[snappyHexMesh] Layers don't fully surround surface | EVBUCF | OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion | 14 | August 20, 2012 05:31 |
smoothing surface | farzad66 | CFX | 1 | May 24, 2012 19:39 |
free convection heat transfer from a heated horizontal surface through a liquid to a thin cooled fin | Kaushik | FLUENT | 1 | May 8, 2000 07:47 |