|
[Sponsors] |
July 20, 2021, 11:07 |
Criteria for choosing time step
|
#1 |
New Member
Mena Pillai
Join Date: Jul 2018
Posts: 5
Rep Power: 8 |
Is there any specific criteria for choosing the deltaT (time step) while simulating solids (seabed in my case) in openFOAM like the CFL criteria for fluids?
Thanks and Regards, Mena |
|
July 21, 2021, 06:10 |
|
#2 | |
Super Moderator
Philip Cardiff
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Dublin, Ireland
Posts: 1,093
Rep Power: 34 |
Quote:
It depends on whether the time integration scheme used in the solid solver is implicit or explicit. If implicit, the solid solver is conditionally stable and any reasonable time-step can be chosen. If explicit, the solid solver requires that the time-step obeys the standard CFL criterion i.e. the Courant number needs to be less than 1.0. Of course, the choice of time-step also depends on your desired temporal resolution/accuracy. This equally applies to both implicit and explicit approaches. Philip |
||
July 21, 2021, 06:24 |
|
#3 |
New Member
Mena Pillai
Join Date: Jul 2018
Posts: 5
Rep Power: 8 |
Thank you so much sir
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
courant number increases to rather large values | 6863523 | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 22 | July 6, 2023 00:48 |
SU2 7.0.7 Built on CentOS 7, parallel computation pyscript mpi exit error? | EternalSeekerX | SU2 | 3 | October 9, 2020 19:28 |
High Courant Number @ icoFoam | Artex85 | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 11 | February 16, 2017 14:40 |
dynamic Mesh is faster than MRF???? | sharonyue | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 14 | August 26, 2013 08:47 |
IcoFoam parallel woes | msrinath80 | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 9 | July 22, 2007 03:58 |