|
[Sponsors] |
Order of boundary conditions in a Partial Differential Equation |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
August 2, 2010, 16:28 |
Order of boundary conditions in a Partial Differential Equation
|
#1 |
New Member
Gaurav
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: London
Posts: 5
Rep Power: 16 |
Is it mathematically incorrect to have a 3rd order boundary condition for a 2nd order Partial Differential Equation?
|
|
August 2, 2010, 17:50 |
|
#2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 358
Rep Power: 19 |
I assume you are referring to a condition on the third derivative of the function to be solved for - in that case the answer is yes - it is incorrect. You would specify conditions on the function or the derivative of the function (or a mixture). The differential equation itself only defines the nth derivative of the function, so n+1 order derivative information on the boundaries is really meaningless.
If you are referring to the order of accuracy of a discretization scheme, then the statement makes sense mathematically, since you could have a third-order accurate approximation to a first-derivative. But it may or may not adversely interact with the 2nd-order approximation of the interior scheme. |
|
May 6, 2015, 17:19 |
|
#3 |
New Member
Gaurav
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: London
Posts: 5
Rep Power: 16 |
Thanks a lot for the explanation.
|
|
Tags |
boundary conditions, mathematics, pde |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
mass flow in is not equal to mass flow out | saii | CFX | 12 | March 19, 2018 06:21 |
Constant velocity of the material | Sas | CFX | 15 | July 13, 2010 09:56 |
What's the requirement of the derivative order of boundary conditions? | hadesmajesty | Main CFD Forum | 0 | July 25, 2009 01:47 |
2nd Order Boundary Conditions | A.S. | Main CFD Forum | 1 | July 27, 2005 05:13 |
Boundary Conditions | Jan Ramboer | Main CFD Forum | 11 | August 16, 1999 09:59 |