|
[Sponsors] |
June 7, 2010, 16:59 |
Moving fluid vs moving body
|
#1 |
Senior Member
|
Hi everybody, I have a question for you:
every time I run a simulation the fluid is moving while the body is still. That means that the situation is similar to the one you would find in a wind tunnel with all it's disadvantages. So I was thinking about moving the body while the rest of the domain is still. The ground should be a wall if the body is a car and the other domain faces could be simmetry plane or a pressure condition could be imposed on them. Would it be a good idea? Is there something I'm missing? What do you think? Thanx Lorenzo |
|
June 7, 2010, 18:04 |
|
#2 |
Member
Burak
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 90
Rep Power: 17 |
Lorenzo,
In order to eliminate boundary layer of the ground(wall which is under the car) while flow is moving, I give the ground "velocity inlet" boundary condition with "magnitude and direction" option. Also except symmetry plane and outflow, everywhere is velocity inlet. By this way, I think I get a good approach like the real world. Hope it makes sense to you. |
|
June 8, 2010, 04:58 |
|
#3 |
Senior Member
|
Yess, that's what I do as well. I was just wondering which would be the difference between setting a case like you described and setting one like I described.
|
|
May 24, 2020, 15:01 |
|
#4 |
Member
Hector
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Barcelona
Posts: 30
Rep Power: 16 |
Hi, I was wondering if somebody else has another explanation.
|
|
May 24, 2020, 18:47 |
|
#5 |
Senior Member
|
Moving the body carries the drawback that you need to rebuild the volume mesh in the wake of the vehicle and this comes at a price. You would also need to refine the mesh in front of the vehicle as it passes by.
|
|
May 24, 2020, 19:29 |
|
#6 | |
Member
Hector
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Barcelona
Posts: 30
Rep Power: 16 |
Quote:
What if we see it as a stationary problem? A body fixed in space with respect to control volume as usual (so no remeshing is needed) with the unusual boundary condition: velocity prescribed on the boundary of the body as movingWallVelocity. |
||
May 25, 2020, 03:42 |
|
#7 |
Senior Member
|
No, that would not work as movingWall is only a surface condition that has an impact on the air that wets the surface. I believe the only case where that would work is a zero thickness flat plate moving parallel to the flow at 0° angle of attack.
|
|
May 26, 2020, 18:28 |
|
#8 |
Member
Hector
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Barcelona
Posts: 30
Rep Power: 16 |
I wish I had the time to check this in OpenFOAM: solve two laminar small problems with same mesh: first one with moving fluid and second one with moving body and compare pressure and viscous forces over body.
|
|
May 26, 2020, 18:42 |
|
#9 |
Senior Member
|
There are differences, because numerical schemes are not perfect
https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&sour...BhO1xuW13jHUkb |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
application part of laminar newtonian fluid past bluff body | swamysrikanth | Main CFD Forum | 0 | December 15, 2009 02:53 |
applications of laminar newtonian fluid past a bluff body | swamysrikanth | FLUENT | 0 | December 15, 2009 02:51 |
how to accelerate fluid in bluff body case? | Rui | Main CFD Forum | 7 | March 5, 2009 11:45 |
Moving a rigid body in a fluid | doum | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 2 | April 4, 2007 10:09 |
Heat transfer to fluid and pipe body | Chris | FLUENT | 1 | December 28, 2002 03:09 |