|
[Sponsors] |
March 9, 2002, 00:55 |
TAB (Taylor Analogy Breakup) Model
|
#1 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
The only reference I got is:
O'Rourke,P.J.; Amsden,A.A., "The TAB Method for Numerical Calculation of Spray Droplet Breakup", SAE Technical Paper 872089, 1987. But I don't have access to this technical paper. There is almost no useful information about TAB method on Internet. Could anybody kindly point me to other papers (or book)? Thanks. |
|
March 9, 2002, 13:42 |
Re: TAB (Taylor Analogy Breakup) Model
|
#2 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
You should be able to order this paper directly from SAE. Go to their website (www.sae.org) and click on "store", then follow the obvious path. Or, you might try to contact the authors, who work in Group T3 at Los Alamos National Laboratory. Their URL is something like gnarly.lanl.gov. Or you might try to contact Rolf Reitz at www.erc.wisc.edu/index.html since he and his group use the TAB model and have worked on some improvements.
|
|
March 10, 2002, 00:57 |
Re: TAB (Taylor Analogy Breakup) Model
|
#3 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Any "book" on this topic?
Thanks. |
|
April 1, 2009, 05:39 |
|
#4 |
Member
Michael
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 48
Rep Power: 17 |
Hi Zi-Wei Chiou,
if you give me your email-adress, I could send you something about the TAB-Model! |
|
April 1, 2009, 08:20 |
|
#5 |
Member
Michael
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 48
Rep Power: 17 |
Hi,
I have one more question about the TAB-Model. I was looking for the implementation of the model, especially the updating of the droplet size! There, the new radius of the droplet is calculated by scalar rNew = 0.04*n*rs; rs is the Sauterradius. What's the background of this formula? And what is n and where does the factor 0.04 come from?? Can anybody help me??? Cheers, Michael |
|
April 1, 2009, 22:43 |
|
#6 |
New Member
Kelly Senecal
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Convergent Science, Madison WI
Posts: 16
Rep Power: 18 |
Hi Michael,
That equation comes from use of the chi-squared drop size distribution. The following steps outline the method: 1. The cumulative distribution function (CDF) is built for the chi-squared distribution - call this cdf(n). 2. When drop breakup is predicted to occur, a random number XX is selected. 3. A loop is done over n. When cdf(n)>XX, the loop is terminated and this value of n is saved. 4. The predicted radius from breakup is then r=0.04*n*smr_tab where smr_tab is the Sauter Mean Radius predicted from the TAB model. The 0.04 in the above expression comes from the fact that the range on drop size is up to a maximum of 4*smr_tab. The maximum value of n is 100 in this case, and thus the maximum value of r is 0.04*100*smr_tab=4*smr_tab. I hope this helps. |
|
April 2, 2009, 05:04 |
|
#7 |
Member
Michael
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 48
Rep Power: 17 |
Now it's clear! Thank you so much!!
I guess the maximum size of 4*smr_tab of a droplet is an assumption?! Is there a reason why a chi-squared distribution is chosen and not any other distribution (like the Rosin-Rammler distribution)? Thanks, Michael |
|
April 2, 2009, 11:44 |
|
#8 |
New Member
Kelly Senecal
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Convergent Science, Madison WI
Posts: 16
Rep Power: 18 |
Hi Michael,
The maximum of 4*smr_tab comes from the following: 1. The CDF is written in terms of Y, where Y=r/rbar. Here r is the drop radius and rbar=(1/3)*smr_tab is the number averaged drop radius. 2. This CDF has a range of 0<Y<12. In other words, CDF(0)=0 and CDF(12) is approximately equal to 1. 3. So the range is 0<Y<12, which is equivalent to 0<r/rbar<12 or 0<r<12*rbar or finally 0<r<4*smr_tab (since smr_tab=3*rbar). I'm not sure which code you are using. In CONVERGE, we allow for chi-squared or Rosin-Rammler distributions when running the TAB model. I hope this helps. |
|
April 2, 2009, 12:12 |
|
#9 |
Member
Michael
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 48
Rep Power: 17 |
This helps definitely!! Thank you very much!!!
|
|
September 22, 2009, 23:24 |
search for articles about TAB
|
#10 |
New Member
HuangWei
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 8
Rep Power: 17 |
Hi,foamers
i'm seaching for articles about TAB model ,anyone could help me,i'd appreciate! |
|
September 23, 2009, 02:52 |
|
#11 | |
Senior Member
Ahmed
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: NY
Posts: 251
Rep Power: 18 |
Quote:
http://www.osti.gov/energycitations/...sti_id=5056321 http://www.osti.gov/energycitations/...sti_id=6118786 Library Without Walls Project |
||
September 23, 2009, 06:06 |
|
#12 |
New Member
HuangWei
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 8
Rep Power: 17 |
thank you very much,Ahmed.
|
|
April 24, 2010, 10:01 |
Rosin Rammler Distribution
|
#13 |
New Member
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 1
Rep Power: 0 |
Hi,
I would like to implement Rosin Rammler Distribution and currently the code i use has Chi-square distribution as explained above. But i need help in implementing the Rosin Rammler Distribution Thanks |
|
September 21, 2022, 16:18 |
|
#14 |
Senior Member
krishna kant
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: Hyderabad, India
Posts: 133
Rep Power: 10 |
Hello All,
Can anyone through some light on how the Ck (coefficient of stiffness) value is calculated in the TAB model? The original TAB paper by Prof. Reitz says it is obtained by matching the fundamental oscillation frequency. And so Ck is 8. The fundamental frequency for the spring-mass system - ω_n=√((C_k σ)/(ρr^3 )) How Ck is obtained from here?? |
|
November 21, 2022, 06:12 |
|
#15 |
New Member
Elias Trautner
Join Date: Jun 2019
Posts: 4
Rep Power: 7 |
Dear all,
I just came across this discussion and have a further question on the droplet size distributions computed using the Chi Squared distribution, following the comments of farbflim and senecal. If I understand correctly, the maximum Sauter Mean Radius r32 for a breakup event is reached for ydot=0, which leads to: r32/r0=1/(1+(8*K/20))=3/7 with K=10/3 Now, if we allow the maximum radius sampled from Chi Squared to be r=0.04*n*r32 with n_max=100, then we get rmax=0.04*100*r32=0.04*100*r0*(3/7)=1.7143*r0 My question is: why would we want to allow the maximum possible radius after breakup to be larger than the radius of the breaking droplet? |
|
December 19, 2023, 10:27 |
|
#16 |
New Member
Join Date: Dec 2023
Posts: 1
Rep Power: 0 |
I think that the condition in L.209 of TAB.C prevents an increase of the radius of the particles in a parcel in case of breakup:
if (rNew < r) .... |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Superlinear speedup in OpenFOAM 13 | msrinath80 | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 18 | March 3, 2015 06:36 |
Low Reynolds k-epsilon model | YJZ | ANSYS | 1 | August 20, 2010 14:57 |
species transport model or mixture model? | achaokaoyan | Main CFD Forum | 0 | July 10, 2010 11:52 |
multi fluid mixture model issue | rystokes | CFX | 3 | August 9, 2009 20:13 |
Problem: hollow cone spray with TAB model. | chenhu | OpenFOAM | 1 | July 3, 2009 12:25 |