CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > General Forums > Main CFD Forum

Finite Volume Method with SIMPLE Algorithm

Register Blogs Community New Posts Updated Threads Search

Like Tree1Likes
  • 1 Post By Hamidzoka

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   October 6, 2024, 02:49
Question Finite Volume Method with SIMPLE Algorithm
  #1
New Member
 
Preeti Rani
Join Date: Nov 2023
Posts: 4
Rep Power: 3
Preeti Rani is on a distinguished road
In CFD, we know SIMPLE algorithm is used to solve governing equations. There we have pressure term in all momentum equation(say x, y, z). What if there is no pressure gradient term in y and z momentum(i.e. exist only in x-momentum)? What will be the control volume for y and z momentum? Is it will be scalar cell or we have to use v-cell and w-cell as we always do in staggered grid?
Preeti Rani is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   October 8, 2024, 12:05
Default
  #2
Senior Member
 
Hamid Zoka
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 293
Rep Power: 19
Hamidzoka is on a distinguished road
When you are applying finite volume to solve 3D flows, you should never think of zero pressure gradient at certain directions. It is always needed to assume that there is a gradient and if the flow physics impose a zero gradient at a certain direction, simulation outputs will show it as you postprocess it.
another thing to note is that, when we are talking about a 3D flow, we normally encounter with sophisticated velocity field, rotations, separations,... . In other words, these x,y,z directions are not isolated ones and it is rather impossible to have exactly zero pressure gardient in one direction and non-zero values in other direction.

Best
Hamidzoka is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   October 9, 2024, 03:28
Question
  #3
New Member
 
Preeti Rani
Join Date: Nov 2023
Posts: 4
Rep Power: 3
Preeti Rani is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hamidzoka View Post
When you are applying finite volume to solve 3D flows, you should never think of zero pressure gradient at certain directions. It is always needed to assume that there is a gradient and if the flow physics impose a zero gradient at a certain direction, simulation outputs will show it as you postprocess it.
another thing to note is that, when we are talking about a 3D flow, we normally encounter with sophisticated velocity field, rotations, separations,... . In other words, these x,y,z directions are not isolated ones and it is rather impossible to have exactly zero pressure gardient in one direction and non-zero values in other direction.

Best
Thank you for your reply....
I attached a file of governing equations which contains pressure only in x-direction. We use staggered grids because of existence of pressure gradient term. But here pressure is only in x-direction. So is it correct to apply only u-velocity control volume as in staggered and for v and w momentum use the same control volume which is for pressure and temperature cell? And in SIMPLE algorithm we find out pressure correction term. Is it contains only east and west face value coz equations does not contains pressure in all direction?
Attached Images
File Type: png Governing.png (52.0 KB, 10 views)
Preeti Rani is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   October 9, 2024, 04:37
Default
  #4
Senior Member
 
Filippo Maria Denaro
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 6,896
Rep Power: 73
FMDenaro has a spectacular aura aboutFMDenaro has a spectacular aura aboutFMDenaro has a spectacular aura about
Generally, that is the case you have a base and constant pressure gradient in one direction that enters as a forcing term into the momentum. But the pressure fluctuation you have to solve is 3d.
FMDenaro is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   October 9, 2024, 04:52
Default
  #5
Senior Member
 
Hamid Zoka
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 293
Rep Power: 19
Hamidzoka is on a distinguished road
Hi,
You can't use SIMPLE with staggered control only on x direction while keeping it non-staggered on other directions. The reason is, pressure correction equation includes coefficiencts and constant term,b, which needs to be calculated at staggered grid. So, if you insist on using non-staggered (co located) control volumes on other directions you need to revise the eqations carefully before application.
There is a more important issue taht I am trying to explain below:

What normally happens in SIMPLE algorithm is: Solution starts with an initial guess of presusre field, calculation of velocity, calculation of pressure correction term and then velocity correction term and then updaing them. Your case, however, needs to keep the pressure constant in y and z directions. In order to make it happen, you need to modify pressure and velocity correction equations such that they only include e,w,E and W (x-direction) components. Therefore, pressure correction terms other than p'w and p'e needs to be removed. Accordingly, y and z components of the velocity correction needs modifications and p' terms on y and z directions should get zero.
If you do not change it and use the conventional SIMPLE algorithm, there will be no guarantee to have zero pressure gradients on y and z. In other words, besides the momentum equations you have two extra equations i.e. dp/dy=0 and dp/dz=0 which need to be reflected in SIMPLE or any other algorithm you use.

Best
Preeti Rani likes this.
Hamidzoka is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   October 9, 2024, 05:43
Post
  #6
New Member
 
Preeti Rani
Join Date: Nov 2023
Posts: 4
Rep Power: 3
Preeti Rani is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hamidzoka View Post
Hi,
You can't use SIMPLE with staggered control only on x direction while keeping it non-staggered on other directions. The reason is, pressure correction equation includes coefficiencts and constant term,b, which needs to be calculated at staggered grid. So, if you insist on using non-staggered (co located) control volumes on other directions you need to revise the eqations carefully before application.
There is a more important issue taht I am trying to explain below:

What normally happens in SIMPLE algorithm is: Solution starts with an initial guess of presusre field, calculation of velocity, calculation of pressure correction term and then velocity correction term and then updaing them. Your case, however, needs to keep the pressure constant in y and z directions. In order to make it happen, you need to modify pressure and velocity correction equations such that they only include e,w,E and W (x-direction) components. Therefore, pressure correction terms other than p'w and p'e needs to be removed. Accordingly, y and z components of the velocity correction needs modifications and p' terms on y and z directions should get zero.
If you do not change it and use the conventional SIMPLE algorithm, there will be no guarantee to have zero pressure gradients on y and z. In other words, besides the momentum equations you have two extra equations i.e. dp/dy=0 and dp/dz=0 which need to be reflected in SIMPLE or any other algorithm you use.

Best
Thank you so much to clear this step. Can you please refer me any book or any article by which i can prove it that pressure correction terms other than p'w and p'e needs to be removed.
Preeti Rani is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   October 9, 2024, 08:12
Default
  #7
Senior Member
 
Hamid Zoka
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 293
Rep Power: 19
Hamidzoka is on a distinguished road
I suggest "Numerical Heat Transfer and Fluid Flow" by Patankar.
Hamidzoka is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Tags
simple algorithm


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
[Other] mesh airfoil NACA0012 anand_30 OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion 13 March 7, 2022 18:22
SU2-7.0.1 on ubuntu 18.04 hyunko SU2 Installation 7 March 16, 2020 05:37
Finite element method ANSYS CFX tomd97 CFX 2 April 4, 2018 05:10
Mesh; wall function for element based finite volume method sheaker CFX 2 January 25, 2018 18:36
References for the finite volume method on unstructured grids old newbie Main CFD Forum 1 April 26, 2011 00:53


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 16:04.