|
[Sponsors] |
December 18, 2023, 13:11 |
What is this mesh's topology?
|
#1 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2023
Posts: 32
Rep Power: 3 |
Hi, I came across this video on youtube, and would like to know more about the mesh (for a cylinder) such as the internal structure? is there a reason to do it that way?
Am i correct in saying there is an o-grid around the cylinder? Capturee.PNG Source:https://www.bing.com/videos/rivervie...F&&FORM=VRDGAR |
|
December 18, 2023, 15:39 |
|
#2 |
Senior Member
Joern Beilke
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Dresden
Posts: 516
Rep Power: 20 |
It's an O-grid around the cylinder but with a horrible mesh quality. They should do some smoothing to get rid of the jumps in cell sizes.
|
|
December 18, 2023, 16:41 |
|
#3 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2023
Posts: 32
Rep Power: 3 |
Hello JBeilke. So an O grid around the cylinder, but for the rest of the area, what’s special about it please? Is there any name for having it structured that way?
Also, was the ‘wake’ kept longer for a particular reason? |
|
December 18, 2023, 19:22 |
|
#4 |
Senior Member
Lucky
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Orlando, FL USA
Posts: 5,747
Rep Power: 66 |
O-grid is the name for this style of grid. It's so-called "O" because the topological lines around the cylinder form an O. Other topologies are the worser C-grid and even worser H-grid. An O-grid allows for the surface mesh around the cylinder to conform to the cylindrical surface and minimizes the grid skewness between the structured blocks. O-grids allow gradual/rapid grid stretching away from the cylinder in all directions. However, an O-grid needs a grid smoother to generate cells that stretch smoothly.
C-grids and H-grids don't need any smoother, because their topology isn't smoothable. They're simpler and very easy to setup. However, their best skewness even with a smoother is worse than an O-grid with a smoother. The O tells you the arrangement of the blocks. Each of the blocks will be structured blocks and don't really get any special names. The wake is longer because you want to simulate enough of the downstream mixing behind the wake so that it doesn't interact with the outlet BC and impact the results. Flow doesn't "flow" upstream, so you can have an inlet closer to the body. |
|
December 19, 2023, 05:23 |
|
#5 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2023
Posts: 32
Rep Power: 3 |
Hi LuckyTran, that’s a really amazing reply! How did you learn about the topology like that? Did you learn it from a book or something please? I’d love to give it a read if it’s from a book or something
Just curious, but how could the flow flow upstream? Would this depend on the upstream velocity please? Thanks! |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
[TurboGrid] problem with topology | verinna | ANSYS Meshing & Geometry | 3 | July 12, 2021 08:28 |
Turbogrid Topology Generation Issues | t8fanning | CFX | 0 | November 6, 2019 12:37 |
[ANSYS Meshing] Selective Shared Topology / Conformal Mesh | Richard Renaud | ANSYS Meshing & Geometry | 2 | November 25, 2015 20:58 |
[TGrid] Water Turbine meshed in TurboGrid: Geometry and Topology issues | ama294 | ANSYS Meshing & Geometry | 12 | September 29, 2014 14:23 |
[ICEM] Shifted Periodic topology | venkat_aero2007 | ANSYS Meshing & Geometry | 17 | August 27, 2013 02:41 |