CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > General Forums > Main CFD Forum

How can we determined wave decay cause artificial problem or physically reasonable?

Register Blogs Community New Posts Updated Threads Search

Like Tree1Likes
  • 1 Post By FMDenaro

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   June 9, 2021, 11:07
Default How can we determined wave decay cause artificial problem or physically reasonable?
  #1
New Member
 
Lin Chen
Join Date: May 2021
Posts: 2
Rep Power: 0
Tlinxo is on a distinguished road
I have simulated a progressive, small amplitude wave (wave length=6m,wave height=0.0304m, water depth=1m, calculating zone length=60m, and damping zone set at 48m) by Fluent VOF in k-wSST turbulent model. And I have transfer the waveform into Tecplot.

it looks a little decay , I'd like to know how can we determined the wave is "physically decay" or "artificially decay"? How can we know this decay is reasonable?

From now on I found out every value of amplitude at the wave crests and wave trough, and calculated the differences between them and the setting wave amplitude. And transfer the value into percentages.

But I can't decide how low is the difference, error of the percentage is physically decay for waves without artificial decay cause meshing or else.
Tlinxo is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   June 9, 2021, 13:15
Default
  #2
Senior Member
 
Filippo Maria Denaro
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 6,897
Rep Power: 73
FMDenaro has a spectacular aura aboutFMDenaro has a spectacular aura aboutFMDenaro has a spectacular aura about
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tlinxo View Post
I have simulated a progressive, small amplitude wave (wave length=6m,wave height=0.0304m, water depth=1m, calculating zone length=60m, and damping zone set at 48m) by Fluent VOF in k-wSST turbulent model. And I have transfer the waveform into Tecplot.

it looks a little decay , I'd like to know how can we determined the wave is "physically decay" or "artificially decay"? How can we know this decay is reasonable?

From now on I found out every value of amplitude at the wave crests and wave trough, and calculated the differences between them and the setting wave amplitude. And transfer the value into percentages.

But I can't decide how low is the difference, error of the percentage is physically decay for waves without artificial decay cause meshing or else.



First of all, when you use a certain numerical scheme you have to be already aware if it introduces numerical diffusion or not.
Then, some specific test-case can be used to check if you work with a lot of numerical diffusion or not.
Finally, a grid refinement can help to check if the numerical diffusion tends to vanish. But you have also to know some characteristic of the flow problem you are studying, the equations will say you if you have a physical damping.
aero_head likes this.
FMDenaro is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
SU2-7.0.1 on ubuntu 18.04 hyunko SU2 Installation 7 March 16, 2020 05:37
Help! Compiled UDF problem 4 Wave tank tutorial Shane FLUENT 1 September 3, 2010 03:32
how i can approch the problem about shock wave chandrakanth CFX 1 December 7, 2008 18:04
how i can approch the problem about shock wave chandrakanth Main CFD Forum 0 December 6, 2008 03:27
problem in solving "wave generation" problem san FLUENT 2 April 4, 2006 00:37


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 00:57.