CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > General Forums > Main CFD Forum

What's the physical meaning of Q-Criterion?

Register Blogs Community New Posts Updated Threads Search

Like Tree27Likes
  • 4 Post By Moreza7
  • 9 Post By FMDenaro
  • 4 Post By FMDenaro
  • 2 Post By aero_head
  • 3 Post By FMDenaro
  • 2 Post By gnwt4a
  • 3 Post By gnwt4a

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   February 9, 2021, 13:12
Default What's the physical meaning of Q-Criterion?
  #1
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2018
Posts: 121
Rep Power: 8
Moreza7 is on a distinguished road
Hello,

According to the definition, the Q-criterion defines vortices as areas where the vorticity magnitude is greater than the magnitude of the rate of strain.

Why does Q-Criterion show the vortices? Why should Q>0 show a vortex? From a mathematical point of view, it's just a number!

Also, suppose that we plot Q=10 and the Q=10000 what's the difference between the vortices with Q=10 and Q=10000?

Thanks
Moreza7 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   February 9, 2021, 14:04
Default
  #2
Senior Member
 
Filippo Maria Denaro
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 6,882
Rep Power: 73
FMDenaro has a spectacular aura aboutFMDenaro has a spectacular aura aboutFMDenaro has a spectacular aura about
Quote:
Originally Posted by Moreza7 View Post
Hello,

According to the definition, the Q-criterion defines vortices as areas where the vorticity magnitude is greater than the magnitude of the rate of strain.

Why does Q-Criterion show the vortices? Why should Q>0 show a vortex? From a mathematical point of view, it's just a number!

Also, suppose that we plot Q=10 and the Q=10000 what's the difference between the vortices with Q=10 and Q=10000?

Thanks

Have you already studied this paper?
https://www.researchgate.net/publica..._JFM_285_69-94
FMDenaro is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   February 9, 2021, 14:33
Default
  #3
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2018
Posts: 121
Rep Power: 8
Moreza7 is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by FMDenaro View Post
Have you already studied this paper?
https://www.researchgate.net/publica..._JFM_285_69-94
Thank you very much.
The first question is answered now. But what about the second question?
What's the difference between the vortices with Q=10 and Q=1000? I think when I plot the Q=10, the vortices with Q=1000 are also plotted. Also, sometimes I get the same structures with Q=10 and Q=1000! How can a vortex have two Qs?! It's confusing.
Moreza7 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   February 9, 2021, 14:56
Default
  #4
Senior Member
 
Filippo Maria Denaro
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 6,882
Rep Power: 73
FMDenaro has a spectacular aura aboutFMDenaro has a spectacular aura aboutFMDenaro has a spectacular aura about
Quote:
Originally Posted by Moreza7 View Post
Thank you very much.
The first question is answered now. But what about the second question?
What's the difference between the vortices with Q=10 and Q=1000? I think when I plot the Q=10, the vortices with Q=1000 are also plotted. Also, sometimes I get the same structures with Q=10 and Q=1000! How can a vortex have two Qs?! It's confusing.



The chosen value Q enters as a source term of the pressure equations, it defines the level of the pressure lines. That means you are considering different sources terms in the Poisson equation for the pressure. The vortex core is associated to minima in the pressure.

Last edited by FMDenaro; February 9, 2021 at 16:26.
FMDenaro is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   February 9, 2021, 15:51
Default
  #5
Senior Member
 
Kira
Join Date: Nov 2020
Location: Canada
Posts: 435
Rep Power: 9
aero_head is on a distinguished road
Thank you Moreza for the question and thank you professor for the paper and the information! Helped me understand this concept better as well.
FMDenaro and Moreza7 like this.
aero_head is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   February 9, 2021, 16:39
Default
  #6
Senior Member
 
Filippo Maria Denaro
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 6,882
Rep Power: 73
FMDenaro has a spectacular aura aboutFMDenaro has a spectacular aura aboutFMDenaro has a spectacular aura about
I suggest also this disseration
https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19910017151
rfavalli, Moreza7 and aero_head like this.
FMDenaro is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   February 10, 2021, 06:57
Default
  #7
Member
 
EM
Join Date: Sep 2019
Posts: 59
Rep Power: 7
gnwt4a is on a distinguished road
the clearest flow interpretation (which still stands) of the (im)balance between the strain & vorticity terms in the poisson equation for the pressure, was originally proposed by Bradshaw&Koh in a short note that appeared in the phys of fluids of 1981. this is where u start. the later elaborations of this are computationally useful.
--
sbaffini and aero_head like this.
gnwt4a is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   February 10, 2021, 13:06
Default
  #8
Senior Member
 
Kira
Join Date: Nov 2020
Location: Canada
Posts: 435
Rep Power: 9
aero_head is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by gnwt4a View Post
the clearest flow interpretation (which still stands) of the (im)balance between the strain & vorticity terms in the poisson equation for the pressure, was originally proposed by Bradshaw&Koh in a short note that appeared in the phys of fluids of 1981. this is where u start. the later elaborations of this are computationally useful.
--
Hello JJ,

Do you have a link to this paper you refer to, or even just the full title?
aero_head is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   February 10, 2021, 21:46
Default
  #9
Member
 
EM
Join Date: Sep 2019
Posts: 59
Rep Power: 7
gnwt4a is on a distinguished road
https://doi.org/10.1063/1.863442
--
ilhado, rfavalli and aero_head like this.
gnwt4a is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   February 10, 2021, 22:07
Default
  #10
Senior Member
 
Kira
Join Date: Nov 2020
Location: Canada
Posts: 435
Rep Power: 9
aero_head is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by gnwt4a View Post
Ah, excellent! Thank you very much.
aero_head is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Tags
q criterion


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
The physical meaning of Reynolds stresses? Moreza7 Main CFD Forum 7 January 29, 2021 06:52
Multiphase flow in cavity---B.C. doesn't correspond to physical meaning linyanx OpenFOAM Pre-Processing 2 December 14, 2016 18:17
[Gmsh] Nasa Nozzle: Plot 3D -->gmsh -->fluent - no physical groups Nico89 OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion 1 June 14, 2016 06:40
Superlinear speedup in OpenFOAM 13 msrinath80 OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 18 March 3, 2015 06:36
Physical meaning of pressure in pressure eqn dontknow Main CFD Forum 2 August 30, 2010 11:12


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 22:54.