|
[Sponsors] |
Skin friction does not become negative in separation region |
![]() |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
![]() |
![]() |
#1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2018
Posts: 121
Rep Power: 8 ![]() |
Hello,
I have simulated the flow around an airfoil using LES, but I have a problem. In some articles the skin friction coefficient becomes negative in the laminar separation region, but in my case it just decreases to near zero, but does not become negative. Just like the attached image. Suppose that the red line is mine and black line is for the article which I compare my results to. Does this mean that the separation is not occured or something else? Regards. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 | |
Senior Member
Filippo Maria Denaro
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 6,830
Rep Power: 73 ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
|
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2018
Posts: 121
Rep Power: 8 ![]() |
Quote:
The grids are the same and the curves are spanwise averaged. My main questions are: 1- If the skin friction doesn't become negative, does it mean that the separation is not occured? If yes, then why it does not become negative in turbulent separation region? How can we tell that the separation is occured by observing Cf? 2- Should I calculate the wall stress by du/dy or du/dn? I used du/dn in this case. |
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | |
Senior Member
Filippo Maria Denaro
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 6,830
Rep Power: 73 ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
Evaluating the skin friction or du/dn is the same, you have the tau_wall stress to compute. In your case there is no appearence of a separation point. Are you averaging along z? And yes, you should use the local reference system (t,n) along the wall so that you compute dut/dn. |
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2018
Posts: 121
Rep Power: 8 ![]() |
Thank you.
Yes, as I said, the results are spanwise-averaged along z. I just noticed that it happened because of the premature numerical trip of boundary layer in CDS. As the mesh is coarse in the upstream of the airfoil. The problem solved by using blending between CDS and 2nd order upwind in the laminar region and upstream of the airfoil. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Tags |
les, separation bubble, skin friction coefficient |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
the skin friction coefficient error from Fluent | sutthinan | Main CFD Forum | 2 | November 28, 2012 13:03 |
[blockMesh] error message with modeling a cube with a hold at the center | hsingtzu | OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion | 2 | March 14, 2012 09:56 |
channelFoam for a 3D pipe | AlmostSurelyRob | OpenFOAM | 3 | June 24, 2011 13:06 |
How to identify flow separation region? | Cheng | CFX | 2 | November 29, 2006 07:26 |
separation region in corner flows submitted to curvature effects | Stephane | Main CFD Forum | 2 | July 13, 1998 19:06 |