CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > General Forums > Main CFD Forum

stability/boundedness of CDS in st.st. FVM

Register Blogs Community New Posts Updated Threads Search

Like Tree1Likes
  • 1 Post By FMDenaro

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   June 19, 2020, 17:48
Default stability/boundedness of CDS in st.st. FVM
  #1
New Member
 
dimitri koletsos
Join Date: May 2020
Posts: 3
Rep Power: 6
dkoletsos is on a distinguished road
Hi all,
From what I understand the Von Neumann stability analysis is used to assess the stability of finite difference schemes and the condition for conditionally stable schemes like the central differencing scheme (CDS) involves a critical timestep. I have two questions:
1. Can the Von Neumann analysis be used for finite volume analysis FVM and if so, would the analysis for CDS in FVM be identical to that of the finite difference method FDM?
2. How does a steady state simulation affect the condition regarding the timestep? Will a conditionally stable scheme be stable or unstable?

Thank you in advance for your answer.

Best regards,
Dimitri
dkoletsos is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   June 19, 2020, 18:16
Default
  #2
Senior Member
 
Filippo Maria Denaro
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 6,849
Rep Power: 73
FMDenaro has a spectacular aura aboutFMDenaro has a spectacular aura aboutFMDenaro has a spectacular aura about
Quote:
Originally Posted by dkoletsos View Post
Hi all,
From what I understand the Von Neumann stability analysis is used to assess the stability of finite difference schemes and the condition for conditionally stable schemes like the central differencing scheme (CDS) involves a critical timestep. I have two questions:
1. Can the Von Neumann analysis be used for finite volume analysis FVM and if so, would the analysis for CDS in FVM be identical to that of the finite difference method FDM?
2. How does a steady state simulation affect the condition regarding the timestep? Will a conditionally stable scheme be stable or unstable?

Thank you in advance for your answer.

Best regards,
Dimitri



1) Yes, it applies to the resulting algebric system both for FD and FV methods. The results of the stability constraint depends on the resulting algebric system, that is not an issue of FV or FD scheme.
2) without time step (steady formulation) there is not stability analysis in the von Neumann sense. You have to see the constraint for the convergence of the iterative method.
dkoletsos likes this.
FMDenaro is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   June 19, 2020, 19:56
Default
  #3
New Member
 
dimitri koletsos
Join Date: May 2020
Posts: 3
Rep Power: 6
dkoletsos is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by FMDenaro View Post
1)You have to see the constraint for the convergence of the iterative method.
Thank you for your answer.

I'm using the SIMPLE algorithm with the strongly implicit procedure (SIP) for the decomposition. I can only find that this method converges quickly, but not on how the central differencing might affect its stability.

Last edited by dkoletsos; June 20, 2020 at 17:28.
dkoletsos is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Tags
boundedness, central differencing, finite volume method, stability analysis


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Trying to understand FDM vs FVM vs Conservative form vs Non-conservative form granzer Main CFD Forum 5 December 4, 2019 04:00
Practical difference between FVM and LBM? pharg_yrartibra Main CFD Forum 2 November 25, 2013 11:52
FVM in 1-D spherical coordinates lost.identity Main CFD Forum 0 January 17, 2011 10:06
comments on FDM, FEM, FVM, SM, SEM, DSEM, BEM kenn Main CFD Forum 2 July 18, 2004 19:28
References for FVM Anthony Wachs Main CFD Forum 8 February 20, 2002 20:23


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:36.