|
[Sponsors] |
Numerical modelling of closed loop pulsating heat pipe with compressible flow |
![]() |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
![]() |
![]() |
#1 |
New Member
Sabrina Carson
Join Date: May 2018
Posts: 15
Rep Power: 8 ![]() |
Dear All,
Recently I wrote an article on numerical simulation of closed loop pulsating heat pipe. The solver I used deals with codensation and Evaporation. The fluid was considered to be incompressible. The reviewer rejected the article and argued, "The solver that is utilised here is an incompressible VOF-based solver. In this case how it operated on a closed loop domain without blowing up. How mass is conserved? The application of this solver for the specific application is questionable according to my opinion. The compressibility issue needs to be addressed." Can anyone suggest how can I model compressible condensation and evaporation situation ? Which CFD package can deal with this situation (e.g. ANSYS, COMSOL etc.)? Or how can I make modifications in existing solvers (e.g. in OpenFOAM)? |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Senior Member
Lucky
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Orlando, FL USA
Posts: 5,728
Rep Power: 66 ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Indeed there are certain mass conservation issues when running certain scenarios in a closed domain. In short, you can run a constant density steady simulation or a compressible transient simulation.
You need to clarify what you mean by "the fluid was considered to be incompressible." The reviewer also needs to clarify what they mean by incompressible. Most solvers nowadays are not true incompressible solvers anyway (they're compressible solvers w/ an equation of state for density and have no problem). You might have "shot yourself in the foot" by even mentioning the word incompressible when it was not needed. No idea what solver you used to comment on the applicability of any solver. Also not sure what compressibility issue is being mentioned. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | |
Senior Member
Arjun
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Nurenberg, Germany
Posts: 1,282
Rep Power: 34 ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
Ask the reviewer that pretty much all the VOF based simulations lose the mass to some degree, why only this article is objected while 10000 articles in a year are published about it. There exist no multiphase simulation that preserves mass 100 %. I know of none. |
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Tags |
ansys, boiling, condensation, evaporation, openfoam |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Setting the height of the stream in the free channel | kevinmccartin | CFX | 12 | October 13, 2022 21:43 |
Multiphase flow - incorrect velocity on inlet | Mike_Tom | CFX | 6 | September 29, 2016 01:27 |
Error - Solar absorber - Solar Thermal Radiation | MichaelK | CFX | 12 | September 1, 2016 05:15 |
Pipe flow heat transfer | feedq | FLUENT | 10 | November 26, 2014 08:23 |
fluid flow fundas | ram | Main CFD Forum | 5 | June 17, 2000 21:31 |