|
[Sponsors] |
troublshooting 2D finite diff solution of pressure wave |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
October 3, 2019, 17:12 |
troublshooting 2D finite diff solution of pressure wave
|
#1 |
New Member
frank
Join Date: Feb 2017
Posts: 8
Rep Power: 9 |
Hi, I'm trying to solve a basic problem with finite difference method in 2D.
I am modeling a pressure wave moving from right to left in a 2D domain. The solution seems fine until the wave hits the right boundary. Then, a pressure gradient develops and the velocity from right to left starts to increase. I have a square grid and set the left side boundary overpressure to 20K Pascals, and temperature to be 356.79 Kelvins. All other boundary conditions on all walls are outflow conditions. They are calculated based on a calculated slope of their adjacent points. Initial temperature is 298 [K]. Initially, a pressure wave travels from the left wall to the right wall. The wave travels as expected, raising the pressure as it goes. The problem is after the wave hits the right outflow boundary. If time keeps incrementing, the pressure falls on the right hand side and I get a pressure gradient. The gradient looks like this from right to left for one row of grid at time = 0.10: 121055.9 120744.7 120433.5 120122.4 119811.2 119500.1 119188.9 118877.7 118566.6 118255.4 117944.2 117633.1 117321.9 117010.8 116699.6 116388.4 116077.3 115766.1 115455.0 My question is... is this gradient normal? I thought the pressure would reach a steady state after the wave passes. While troubleshooting, I noticed the velocity seems to keep increasing long after the wave passes, and there is no velocity gradient. I suppose this increase is due to the pressure gradient. The temperature and internal energy show a similar gradient. Density stays approximately constant. Any help appreciated. Should it reach steady state right after the wave passes? |
|
October 3, 2019, 17:36 |
|
#2 | |
Senior Member
Filippo Maria Denaro
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 6,877
Rep Power: 73 |
Quote:
Wall or outflow? How many outflow sections? However, for compressible flows you have to set properly the boundary conditions depending on the subsonic/supersonic conditions. That happens to take into account the direction of the characteristic curves. See https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=...J-tLsyDnGaxapa |
||
October 3, 2019, 21:09 |
|
#3 | |
New Member
frank
Join Date: Feb 2017
Posts: 8
Rep Power: 9 |
Quote:
Hi, thank you for the reply. I set everything to outflow, no walls. The only thing I did not set to outflow are the pressure and temperature on the left side boundary. Thanks for the paper, I will read through it. |
||
October 13, 2019, 19:23 |
|
#4 |
New Member
frank
Join Date: Feb 2017
Posts: 8
Rep Power: 9 |
Edit : I forgot a vector square is a dot product, please ignore (can't figure out how to delete this reply)
|
|
October 13, 2019, 19:35 |
|
#5 | |
Senior Member
Filippo Maria Denaro
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 6,877
Rep Power: 73 |
Quote:
(uk uk) is just (u^2+v^2+w^2) (kinetic energy) that sum to the internal energy to provide the total energy E |
||
October 17, 2019, 15:37 |
|
#6 | |
New Member
frank
Join Date: Feb 2017
Posts: 8
Rep Power: 9 |
Hi, after reading through the paper you graciously posted, I am stuck.
I'm trying to figure out on a boundary when I can't use the interior flow-field. ( is velocity in direction). I can't use the interior flow field, per the paper, because this represents an incoming wave. The paper mentions something about solving 1D Euler to get this variable, but I'm not sure how to translate a 1D solution into . comes from solving 2D subsonic inflow on one boundary. The paper states I need 4 conditions for a 3D boundary, so I assume 3 conditions for a 2D boundary. (Is that a valid assumption?) I choose pressure, density, and internal energy (P, p, e) to be constants on this boundary. Then, I reduce the system to two equations on the boundary by following guidelines in the paper : But I can't time step for the boundary condition until I figure out . Any help is greatly appreciated! Quote:
|
||
Tags |
finite difference |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
periodic straight tube flow, no mesh independent solution for pressure gradient | thijs1909 | FLUENT | 5 | May 16, 2018 10:04 |
Periodic flow using Cyclic - comparison with Fluent | nusivares | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 30 | December 12, 2017 06:35 |
CFX Solver stopped with error when requested for backup during solver running | Mfaizan | CFX | 40 | May 13, 2016 07:50 |
sonicFoam - pressure driven pipe: flow continuity violation and waveTransmissive BC | Endel | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 3 | September 11, 2014 17:29 |
Hydrostatic pressure in 2-phase flow modeling (long) | DS & HB | Main CFD Forum | 0 | January 8, 2000 16:00 |