|
[Sponsors] |
Using steady state for Transient Initialization |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
September 13, 2019, 22:44 |
Using steady state for Transient Initialization
|
#1 |
Member
Soumitra Vadnerkar
Join Date: Aug 2018
Posts: 70
Rep Power: 8 |
How will the convergence of steady state simulation of a problem will affect its transient simulation if used for initialization?
|
|
September 14, 2019, 04:59 |
|
#2 |
Senior Member
|
Too vague.
In general, if you plan to use the same turbulence modeling approach in both steady and unsteady (laminar/DNS or RANS/URANS) then, if the steady solution makes any sense, you don't need the unsteady one. If using RANS to initialize LES/DNS, you probably want almost converged mass fluxes and a good enough distribution of the turbulent quantities used to initialize the fluctuations Last edited by sbaffini; September 14, 2019 at 07:09. |
|
September 14, 2019, 05:02 |
|
#3 |
Senior Member
Filippo Maria Denaro
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 6,896
Rep Power: 73 |
Paolo addressed the main issues.
Just to add that if you have a steady flow problem and you run a transient formulation starting from the initial steady numerical solution, you should find the code stops immediately as it reached the correct solution. |
|
Tags |
initialization, steady state, transient |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Setting the height of the stream in the free channel | kevinmccartin | CFX | 12 | October 13, 2022 22:43 |
Effect of initial condition for steady state vs Transient | prasa | ANSYS | 0 | August 22, 2018 05:45 |
Domain Reference Pressure and mass flow inlet boundary | AdidaKK | CFX | 75 | August 20, 2018 06:37 |
Constant velocity of the material | Sas | CFX | 15 | July 13, 2010 09:56 |
About the difference between steady and unsteady problems | Lisa | Main CFD Forum | 11 | July 5, 2000 15:37 |