|
[Sponsors] |
July 17, 2019, 08:14 |
Error wavelength for mesh size
|
#1 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2018
Posts: 115
Rep Power: 8 |
Hello,
while reading a CFD book, I came across this paragraph: Quote:
|
||
July 17, 2019, 10:25 |
|
#2 | |
Senior Member
Filippo Maria Denaro
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 6,849
Rep Power: 73 |
Quote:
consider the error like a function built by a Fourier series, a coarse mesh is able to do a "filtering" effect on the components of the errors. When the mesh is sufficiently coarse also the components at low wavenumbers are smoothed. Concersely, for a fine mesh you have a very slow decay. This is a concept at the basis of the multigrid methods |
||
July 17, 2019, 11:38 |
|
#3 |
Senior Member
Lucky
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Orlando, FL USA
Posts: 5,747
Rep Power: 66 |
Consider a cell and its immediate adjacent neighbors. You do the FVM method on this cell and try to solve your equations but you end up with a small error (the residual). This is the short wavelength error.
Now you have a cell in the inside the domain (say the center). You end up with a solution for this interior cell, whatever that solution is. Although it may (or may not) satisfy the local flux balances, it may be inconsistent with the boundary conditions imposed on the domain surfaces. This is the long wavelength error. There are intermediate wavelengths... say between a cell and not its immediate neighbors but a few houses down. As already mentioned, the grid acts like filter and a smoother. Because of the way the FVM method tends to localize the solution process (the linear system that you solve usually consists of a cell and its nearest neighbors), the longest wavelength errors don't get removed very quickly compared to the smallest wavelength errors. As the grid becomes finer it becomes worse. The practical outcome of this phenomenon is, without multi-grid algorithms or convergence accelerators, you need more and more iterations to converge as you make your mesh finer and finer (in addition to the calculation already being more computationally costly on a finer mesh). |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
DPM simulation-Restrictions on the mesh size to particle size ratio? | cryabroad | Fluent Multiphase | 5 | June 16, 2022 02:51 |
[ICEM] Help with fixing imported IGES model | siw | ANSYS Meshing & Geometry | 24 | August 24, 2010 12:22 |
Gambit Unstructed (Tet) Mesh - size control | newbie | FLUENT | 3 | August 26, 2008 12:38 |
fluent add additional zones for the mesh file | SSL | FLUENT | 2 | January 26, 2008 12:55 |
Stack frame size, Origin 2000, fortran, a question. | Sergei Chernyshenko | Main CFD Forum | 4 | February 22, 1999 15:24 |