CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > General Forums > Main CFD Forum

Alternatives to Ansys CFX for steam turbines CFD analysis.

Register Blogs Community New Posts Updated Threads Search

Like Tree1Likes
  • 1 Post By akidess

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   June 25, 2018, 04:21
Smile Alternatives to Ansys CFX for steam turbines CFD analysis.
  #1
Member
 
Ndong-Mefane Stephane Boris
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Kawasaki (JAPAN)
Posts: 53
Rep Power: 12
S_teph_2000 is on a distinguished road
Hello,
I am presently (Happily) using Ansys CFX for steam turbines related CFD analysis:
- Compressible
- Multiphase flows (using IAPWS library for steam), equilibrium & non-equilibrium models.
- Steady & Transient
- Multi-core analysis
- CFX-turbo package

The problem is that recently, the quantity, size and complexity of my analysis have greatly increased, I invested in new/more powerful machines for my team, but investing in additional ANSYS licenses is out of reach for now, especially when it comes to HPC: I need a cheaper (so no open-source-->Commercial) alternative to CFX on the side to use all those new CPUs and speed up the job, and I don't have time or resources to start studying/using an OpenFoam-like system right now.
I hear about Numeca Fine Turbo, Star-CCM, Altair etc... but I don't have a clear picture of the pricing involved compared to what I have/had to pay with ANSYS licenses.
If you could guide me through this jungle, it would save me a lot of time (avoiding meeting the sales engineers of every potential software of interest to only discover that it does not do the job, or is still too expensive...),

Thank you all in advance for your help

Kazu.
S_teph_2000 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   June 25, 2018, 10:49
Default
  #2
Senior Member
 
akidess's Avatar
 
Anton Kidess
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Germany
Posts: 1,377
Rep Power: 30
akidess will become famous soon enough
Since you are willing to spend money, I think you discarded OpenFOAM too early. From the cash you save on licensing you can pay for a support contract to get you going in short time, or buy a GUI such as TCFD (https://www.cfdsupport.com/turbomachinery-cfd.html) or VisualCFD (https://www.openfoam.com/products/visualcfd.php).
S_teph_2000 likes this.
__________________
*On twitter @akidTwit
*Spend as much time formulating your questions as you expect people to spend on their answer.
akidess is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   June 25, 2018, 22:23
Default
  #3
Member
 
Ndong-Mefane Stephane Boris
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Kawasaki (JAPAN)
Posts: 53
Rep Power: 12
S_teph_2000 is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by akidess View Post
Since you are willing to spend money, I think you discarded OpenFOAM too early. From the cash you save on licensing you can pay for a support contract to get you going in short time, or buy a GUI such as TCFD (https://www.cfdsupport.com/turbomachinery-cfd.html) or VisualCFD (https://www.openfoam.com/products/visualcfd.php).
Thank you for your answer Akidess,
Please, take a look at the list of analysis I need to do in my original post, I don't know the extent of VisualCFD/Openfoam capabilities, But I've checked TCFD...
I met the people from CFDsupport at the ASME Turbo Expo 2 weeks ago, and they told me that they still cannot work with multi-phase compressible flows in general. This is my biggest concern when considering Openfoam: No readily usable solution for Steam turbines CFD when you stray away from Big players like ANSYS-CFX, StarCCM, etc... . I've personally tried code_saturne --> compressible multi-phase flows not officially/fully supported, no real example, and a lot of tweaking needed.
I would like to skip the "New capability implementation phase" if possible...
I you know of an affordable/accessible software that already fills that need without additional customization, please tell me.

Kazu
S_teph_2000 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   June 26, 2018, 05:28
Default
  #4
Senior Member
 
akidess's Avatar
 
Anton Kidess
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Germany
Posts: 1,377
Rep Power: 30
akidess will become famous soon enough
What exactly do you mean when you say compressible multiphase flows? What models would you like to have?

PS. Isn't it annoying that the major CFD vendors are not transparent in their license costs? Unfortunately I can't tell you more than you already know, and I would start with the same people that you already mentioned.
__________________
*On twitter @akidTwit
*Spend as much time formulating your questions as you expect people to spend on their answer.
akidess is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   June 26, 2018, 06:51
Default
  #5
Senior Member
 
Joern Beilke
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Dresden
Posts: 533
Rep Power: 20
JBeilke is on a distinguished road
https://unicfd.ru/en/simulations/liq...merical-model/

Some of the problems with compressible multiphase flows are described in this article. The steam turbine flow should be possible with the addition of a phase change model to this solver.
JBeilke is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   June 26, 2018, 07:56
Default
  #6
Senior Member
 
akidess's Avatar
 
Anton Kidess
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Germany
Posts: 1,377
Rep Power: 30
akidess will become famous soon enough
Quote:
Originally Posted by JBeilke View Post
Some of the problems with compressible multiphase flows are described in this article. The steam turbine flow should be possible with the addition of a phase change model to this solver.
Seems to already be available here:
https://openfoamwiki.net/index.php/C...haseChangeFoam

The standard multiphaseEulerFoam also supports compressible phases with heat transfer (not sure about phase change).
__________________
*On twitter @akidTwit
*Spend as much time formulating your questions as you expect people to spend on their answer.
akidess is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   June 26, 2018, 21:37
Default
  #7
Member
 
Ndong-Mefane Stephane Boris
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Kawasaki (JAPAN)
Posts: 53
Rep Power: 12
S_teph_2000 is on a distinguished road
Hello,

I am mainly using an equilibrium phase-change model (the mixture of the two phases [steam&water] is in local thermodynamic equilibrium) for compressible steam, in steady and unsteady CFD. The IAPWS library is used to define the steam properties.

Kazu
S_teph_2000 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   June 28, 2018, 16:05
Default
  #8
Senior Member
 
Lucky
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Orlando, FL USA
Posts: 5,754
Rep Power: 66
LuckyTran has a spectacular aura aboutLuckyTran has a spectacular aura aboutLuckyTran has a spectacular aura about
Star-CCM also has very similar features to CFX and quite easy to switch to. On a per core basis the licensing from CD-Adapco is quite competitive with ANSYS. But w/ Star-CCM there is something called a power license which lets you run (a single job) on any number of cores that you like, meaning it's very scalable. ANSYS also has a similar unlimited license but they charge a lot more for it & it's not advertised. I think it's worth giving your local Star-CCM representative a call. Make sure you ask for the academic discount if it applies to you.
LuckyTran is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
ANSYS CFX with Remeshing in ICEM CFD adeban CFX 21 March 29, 2021 07:06
CFD Online Celebrates 20 Years Online jola Site News & Announcements 22 January 31, 2015 01:30
Ansys CFX vs CFD for multiphase+particle zeitoun ANSYS 1 June 4, 2010 04:58
tutorial for CFD & modal (acoustic) analysis ansys workbench 11 badterojan ANSYS 1 June 18, 2009 11:29
Will the ANSYS - FLUENT- CFX kill freedom of CFD? Ben Main CFD Forum 17 September 20, 2006 04:36


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:18.