|
[Sponsors] |
February 5, 2018, 18:47 |
PDE Limitations of Godunov Methods
|
#1 |
New Member
Huzafa
Join Date: Feb 2018
Posts: 1
Rep Power: 0 |
I understand that Godunov type methods are very popular for solving hyperbolic PDEs, but are they less applicable to solving parabolic and/or elliptic PDEs? Are there any possible limitations of these type of methods?
Thanks |
|
February 7, 2018, 00:07 |
|
#2 |
Super Moderator
|
Hyperbolic pde admit discontinuous solutions. Central difference-type and galerkin-type methods are not stable for such problems. Godunov method is based on solving Riemann problem, which has a discontinuity. You can construct a stable scheme by this approach.
Parabolic and elliptic pde do not have shocks, so it does not make sense to try to use Godunov method. You can construct stable central/galerkin-type schemes for such problems. |
|
Tags |
godunov, hyperbolic, pde |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Any questions about Runge-Kutta methods | Runge_Kutta | Main CFD Forum | 33 | September 9, 2019 17:32 |
Rheolef 6.1: an efficient FEM C++ finite element library for solving PDE | saramito | Main CFD Forum | 0 | May 17, 2012 04:01 |
Algorithm for coupled pde with all flux boundary conditions | benk | Main CFD Forum | 3 | December 28, 2010 06:09 |
comments on FDM, FEM, FVM, SM, SEM, DSEM, BEM | kenn | Main CFD Forum | 2 | July 18, 2004 19:28 |
I just wonder why "SIMPLE" | Junseok Kim | Main CFD Forum | 21 | May 20, 2001 09:47 |