|
[Sponsors] |
Why we use finite number of Terms in Fourier Decomposition of Error in Von Neumann St |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
January 26, 2018, 10:17 |
Why we use finite number of Terms in Fourier Decomposition of Error in Von Neumann St
|
#1 |
New Member
abcd efgh ijkl
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 26
Rep Power: 11 |
In Fourier decomposition of error in Von Neumann stability analysis, we assume that the domain is of finite length, and therefore, we use discrete Fourier representation. My question is why we use finite number of harmonics instead of infinite number of harmonics?
|
|
January 26, 2018, 11:42 |
|
#2 | |
Senior Member
Filippo Maria Denaro
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 6,897
Rep Power: 73 |
Quote:
The answer is twofold. 1) the finite lenght L, once subdivided by a finite number of N step of size h, introduces the Nyquist cut-off frequency Kc=L/2h. No Fourier components are represented beyond Kc. 2) The von Neumann analysis is linear, therefore we introduce one generic components having wavenumber ranging from the lowest to the highest represented. |
||
January 26, 2018, 15:46 |
|
#3 | |
New Member
abcd efgh ijkl
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 26
Rep Power: 11 |
Quote:
|
||
Tags |
stability analysis, von neumann |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
SigFpe when running ANY application in parallel | Pj. | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 3 | April 23, 2015 15:53 |
meshing of a compound volume in GMSH | shawn3531 | OpenFOAM | 4 | March 12, 2015 11:45 |
DecomposePar unequal number of shared faces | maka | OpenFOAM Pre-Processing | 6 | August 12, 2010 10:01 |
[blockMesh] BlockMeshmergePatchPairs | hjasak | OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion | 11 | August 15, 2008 08:36 |