|
[Sponsors] |
November 10, 2017, 15:34 |
Citation Question
|
#1 |
New Member
sulaiman
Join Date: Feb 2016
Posts: 18
Rep Power: 10 |
Hey Guys,
So I did some CFD on turbulent flow analysis and want to reference some of the equations I used like: Turbulence Intensity= 0.16 Re^(-1/8) Length Scale= 0.07* d Also, I read somewhere in here that inlet turbulent intensity for moderate flow applications like HVAC can be assumed as 5%. Do you guys have a good reference, like a book, so I could cite these above information to? Thank you |
|
November 10, 2017, 16:00 |
|
#2 |
Senior Member
Lucky
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Orlando, FL USA
Posts: 5,747
Rep Power: 66 |
As far as I know, those two equations are from the Fluent User's Guide. Its source is not referenced in the Fluent manual. But if there is a solid reference, I would like to know. I would guess Batchelor or Shapiro. But most people know that the Reynolds stresses in pipe flows are not equal in all directions and that even k varies strongly across the dimensions of the pipe, which suggests that this result was derived from (CFD) experience.
In my opinion, turbulence intensity without a length scale attached to it is meaningless and the length scale is much more important. A fly buzzing around can just as easily generate as much turbulence intensity as a a T-rex running through a room. You can test this by running a simulation with a very high I 100 or 1000% and small L (the turbulence will decay rapidly and might not even transport anywhere) and compare it to a small I and large L. If your problem is truly sensitive to these boundary conditions for I and L (or k and epsilon, or k and omega) then I would assume you have already put the effort into obtaining these parameters, which might even require its own CFD using BC's that you do know. |
|
November 10, 2017, 16:24 |
|
#3 |
New Member
sulaiman
Join Date: Feb 2016
Posts: 18
Rep Power: 10 |
Thank you for the reply.
Actually my problem is not sensitive to these BCs, I tried to vary them and almost got same results but my professor is insisting in getting " real" reference for them instead of " fluent user's guide" |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Question about symmetry in Autodesk Cfd 2016 | ecto | Autodesk Simulation CFD | 0 | October 20, 2015 05:16 |
small question about the functionalities of topological changes in OpenFoam | ngj | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 2 | February 28, 2013 11:02 |
Question Re Engineering Data Source | imnull | ANSYS | 0 | March 5, 2012 14:51 |
internal field question - PitzDaily Case | atareen64 | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 2 | January 26, 2011 16:26 |
Poisson Solver question | Suresh | Main CFD Forum | 3 | August 12, 2005 05:37 |