|
[Sponsors] |
August 17, 2017, 19:56 |
y+ for realizable k-e model
|
#1 |
New Member
mohammad mokhtari
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: Iran,Tehran
Posts: 2
Rep Power: 0 |
My project is about external flow around tube bundles (2D) . I want to get the Nusselt number around the tubes. Reynolds number is between 6000 & 16000. The model I used is realizable k-e . I want to Know what’s the best mesh around tubes so I need y+ range for my model.
I did a lot of research to find this range, but I have not reached the definitive answer .for example I find a article which used y+<3 for enhance wall treatment and 3<y+<10 for non-equilibrium wall functions. I have two questions: 1. Is this model good for my geometry. 2. What’s the range of y+ for my model. My second question is so importand for me. The y+ that I've got from one of my mesh is between 2 and 15. Thank you for your suggestions.[/SIZE] |
|
August 18, 2017, 16:57 |
|
#2 |
Senior Member
Matt
Join Date: Aug 2014
Posts: 947
Rep Power: 18 |
The y+ range that is acceptable is a product of the near wall model that you are using and not the turbulence model per se. As you noted, there is no DEFINITIVE answer. The article that you mention that has the conditional y+ limits is probably some kind of blended function. The traditional wall model (u+=y+) technically requires y+=1 but is generally considered to be fairly accurate up to y+<5, some people will use y+<3 to give them that warm fuzzy feeling about their results. I would be cautious about having y+<<1 as well. That can cause all kinds of problems as well.
Beyond this value cutoff value, a log law is used to get u+ from y+ in order to close the turbulence equations. What wall model are you using? |
|
August 19, 2017, 12:41 |
|
#3 | |
New Member
mohammad mokhtari
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: Iran,Tehran
Posts: 2
Rep Power: 0 |
Quote:
|
||
August 21, 2017, 11:17 |
|
#4 |
Senior Member
Matt
Join Date: Aug 2014
Posts: 947
Rep Power: 18 |
For non-equilibrium, I think that 3<y+<10 is not unreasonable.
|
|
Tags |
range y+ for k-e model, turbulent flow in tube |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
kklOmega omega boundary condition at the wall - OF3.0 | Artur | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 1 | June 17, 2016 16:42 |
Turbulence model choice | dave13 | CFX | 3 | December 22, 2015 08:12 |
problem with solving lagrange reaction cloud | Polli | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 0 | April 30, 2014 08:53 |
manualInjection model in sprayFoam | Mentalo | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 1 | April 2, 2014 10:29 |
Problems bout CFD model of biomass gasification, Downdraft gasifier | wanglong | FLUENT | 2 | November 26, 2009 00:27 |