|
[Sponsors] |
December 29, 2016, 17:27 |
some turbulence CFD problems
|
#1 |
Senior Member
mohammad
Join Date: Sep 2015
Posts: 279
Rep Power: 12 |
Hello everybody
I have solved a duct with my fortran code, so I wanna validate the results. thus my main questions are: exactly what is the correct way for post processing following terms? 1- I need shear stress of the surface so I calculate velocity gradient with upper cell. my problem is which upper cells. the cells that adopt their numbers with surface cell numbers? or closest one? 1- I wanna validate law of wall. so I need u_tau (friction velocity). I have friction velocities of surfaces. but what is the friction velocities of upper cell centers in domain. I know it is the amounts of cells on wall but for node in j=4 and i=30(4 node upper the wall) is friction velocity for j=1 and i=30 correct? or I should use the amounts for closest cell? I will be so happy to help me or introducing a tutorial. |
|
December 31, 2016, 02:05 |
|
#2 |
Senior Member
mohammad
Join Date: Sep 2015
Posts: 279
Rep Power: 12 |
No answer???? really!!!
|
|
December 31, 2016, 04:36 |
|
#3 |
Senior Member
Filippo Maria Denaro
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 6,849
Rep Power: 73 |
If you are solving DNS or LES with resolved BL, you can also adopt a simple first order accurate forward/backward normal derivative. Second order accuracy requires three nodes (one on the wall, two in the fluid region).
The velocity u_tau is that defined by tau_wall = rho*u_tau^2 |
|
December 31, 2016, 08:29 |
|
#4 |
Senior Member
mohammad
Join Date: Sep 2015
Posts: 279
Rep Power: 12 |
thank you Mr Denaro,
my main question is about u_tau in domain, that is defined by the wall. imagine in two or three nodes over wall, what is the amount of u_tau??? |
|
December 31, 2016, 08:35 |
|
#5 |
Senior Member
Filippo Maria Denaro
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 6,849
Rep Power: 73 |
||
December 31, 2016, 09:28 |
|
#6 |
Super Moderator
Alex
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Germany
Posts: 3,427
Rep Power: 49 |
You calculate u_tau for the wall once. For the analysis you (probably) have in mind, this value of u_tau has to be the same for all distances from the wall.
|
|
December 31, 2016, 09:30 |
|
#7 |
Senior Member
mohammad
Join Date: Sep 2015
Posts: 279
Rep Power: 12 |
in the domain we have a wall and many grids above it. i can find the u_tau for the wall. this amount can be changed along the duct. so what is the amount of u_tau for nodes above the wall. because i wanna define y_plus and u_plus for all nodes in domain.
|
|
December 31, 2016, 10:10 |
|
#8 | |
Senior Member
mohammad
Join Date: Sep 2015
Posts: 279
Rep Power: 12 |
Quote:
but if we have various u_tau on wall and also displacement in nodes in normal direction so how you relate u_tau amounts on wall to upper grids? as you see in pictures we have four nodes. so we have u_tau for them. u_tau changes from 1 to 4. but for nodes in far from wall if we have displacement, what is the u_tau amount? |
||
December 31, 2016, 14:39 |
|
#9 |
Super Moderator
Alex
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Germany
Posts: 3,427
Rep Power: 49 |
Use the value from the nearest wall node. For higher accuracy you can interpolate the values of u_tau to the wall position with the closest wall-normal distance to the cell itself.
utau_wall.jpg |
|
December 31, 2016, 15:31 |
|
#10 |
Senior Member
Filippo Maria Denaro
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 6,849
Rep Power: 73 |
There is a unique velocity scale in the inner region
https://www.cfd-online.com/Wiki/Intr...urbulent_flows |
|
December 31, 2016, 15:43 |
|
#11 | |
Senior Member
mohammad
Join Date: Sep 2015
Posts: 279
Rep Power: 12 |
Quote:
|
||
January 11, 2017, 23:07 |
|
#12 |
Member
Jingchang.Shi
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Hang Zhou, China
Posts: 78
Rep Power: 14 |
\U_tau is defined at the wall. If you've already calculated it , you can further calculate y^+ for any node. y^+ = y \nu / u_tau.
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Convergence Problems with turbulence kinetic energy | Batou | FLUENT | 0 | May 9, 2015 16:44 |
problems by changing turbulence modell | biro | CFX | 10 | January 18, 2015 06:47 |
Future CFD Research | Jas | Main CFD Forum | 10 | March 30, 2013 13:26 |
CFD Research - Turbulence | Pogas | Main CFD Forum | 2 | July 4, 2004 22:35 |
CFD - Trends and Perspectives | Jonas Larsson | Main CFD Forum | 16 | August 7, 1998 17:27 |