|
[Sponsors] |
July 13, 2016, 21:58 |
Schools for Combustion (CFD) Ph.D.?
|
#1 |
New Member
Join Date: Apr 2015
Posts: 17
Rep Power: 11 |
Hey all,
I would like to pursue a Ph.D. in Aerospace Engineering with a focus on the field of Combustion. I assume, in this day and age of numerical simulation, that such a degree would entail intimate familiarity with CFD. I am open to more "pure science," but I still would like to become an expert in the field of Combustion CFD as that would be a helpful skill to have in my pursuit of the pure science of combustion. My end goal is to become an expert in combustion (simulation) in order to design equipment ranging from jet engines to gas turbines to even rocket propulsion devices. It's imperative that we use combustion smartly as our fossil fuel reserves dwindle and the Earth's atmosphere gets polluted (I do not wish to get too political here), and I want to help in that end. I have my undergraduate degree in Mechanical Engineering. It's from a generic state school; not terribly impressive. I'm working in industry in a completely unrelated field, but my position requires research and creative thinking/innovation often (I assist customers in finding (unique) ways to protect their equipment in myriad environments). I did not do any research assistantships in my time as an undergraduate. In my job, however, I have much R&D-related experience. Thus, I do not expect to get into a top-tier school. I am okay with that. However, my research into schools has turned up the usuals -- Stanford, MIT, GaTech, Cornell, etc. It has also turned up the likes of Arizona State University, Iowa State University, and even Wichita State University. The latter has a 98% undergraduate acceptance rate. I am not sure I can trust that as a "good" school, even though graduate and undergraduate are mutually exclusive. So, to state my question point-blank: What are some reputable schools that don't necessarily have the prestige of Ivy Leagues but offer great graduate programs in Aerospace Engineering, specifically Combustion? Thanks in advance! |
|
July 19, 2016, 22:27 |
|
#2 |
New Member
Join Date: Apr 2015
Posts: 17
Rep Power: 11 |
Bump Bump!
|
|
July 20, 2016, 10:39 |
|
#3 |
Member
Mianzhi Wang
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Columbus, IN
Posts: 34
Rep Power: 11 |
||
July 20, 2016, 16:59 |
|
#4 |
New Member
Matt Levins
Join Date: Nov 2014
Posts: 17
Rep Power: 12 |
There is a position opening up soon with Dr. Omid Samimi at wayne State university in detroit
|
|
July 20, 2016, 18:40 |
|
#5 |
New Member
Jean Park
Join Date: Jul 2016
Posts: 3
Rep Power: 10 |
I know Professor Mueller from Princeton does numerical combustion Stuff. But in general, WPI and University of Maryland are the two biggest combustion/fire protection engineering school in the nation so you might want to look into their program.
|
|
July 21, 2016, 21:36 |
|
#6 | ||
New Member
Join Date: Apr 2015
Posts: 17
Rep Power: 11 |
Quote:
Quote:
Would you consider a "Fire Protection" program to be one that would fare well in combustion as regards jet and turbine propulsion? |
|||
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
CFD Online Celebrates 20 Years Online | jola | Site News & Announcements | 22 | January 31, 2015 01:30 |
STAR-Works : Mainstream CAD with CFD | CD adapco Group Marketing | Siemens | 0 | February 13, 2002 13:23 |
Where do we go from here? CFD in 2001 | John C. Chien | Main CFD Forum | 36 | January 24, 2001 22:10 |
Which is better to develop in-house CFD code or to buy a available CFD package. | Tareq Al-shaalan | Main CFD Forum | 10 | June 13, 1999 00:27 |
public CFD Code development | Heinz Wilkening | Main CFD Forum | 38 | March 5, 1999 12:44 |