|
[Sponsors] |
November 3, 2015, 12:20 |
Combustion CFD Question
|
#1 |
New Member
Jack
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 2
Rep Power: 0 |
Hi Everybody,
Pretty broad CFD question coming up... In about 2 months of research into combustion CFD, I've seen plenty of studies that use a 2D axisymmetric (wedge) mesh to simulate compression ignition but zero studies using this type of engine geometry for Spark Ignited cases. I get that axisymmetric cases are highly idealized and that there isn't a whole lot of symmetry in spark engines but are there any other arguments out there for or against 2D gasoline CFD simulations, apart from those two intuitions? Thanks in advance. |
|
November 3, 2015, 14:16 |
|
#2 |
New Member
Sarang
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 22
Rep Power: 11 |
Compression ignition
A sector approach is usually preferred for diesel combustion simulations because of the way fuel is injected. If you have a 6 hole multi-nozzle injector you could create a sector of 60 degrees. The sides of the sector mesh are assigned periodic boundary condition and not a symmetry BC. Spark Ignition 1. The entire engine is modelled because the flame front is not symmetric (due to non-homogeneities in fuel composition and turbulence quantities). 2. It is extremely important to capture TKE to get the flame propagation correctly (at-least while using detailed chemical kinetics). This can be achieved only if you simulate the intake stroke (full engine geometry). |
|
Tags |
cfd, combustion |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
CFD Design...The CFD Future | John C. Chien | Main CFD Forum | 20 | November 20, 2015 00:40 |
Future CFD Research | Jas | Main CFD Forum | 10 | March 30, 2013 13:26 |
CFD of combustion process of Homogeneous Charge Compression Engine (HCCI) | kelvinlim | Main CFD Forum | 2 | January 26, 2012 23:19 |
Question regarding CFD PhD | Mateo | Main CFD Forum | 4 | January 5, 2006 04:52 |
ASME CFD Symposium, Atlanta, July 2001 | Chris R. Kleijn | Main CFD Forum | 0 | September 13, 2000 05:48 |