|
[Sponsors] |
October 1, 2015, 03:28 |
2D test case validation in a 3D solver
|
#1 |
Senior Member
Ashwani
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Hyderabad
Posts: 154
Rep Power: 13 |
Dear all,
The question I had was when we want to solve a 2D (@ x, y) case in a 3D solver, we give a 1 cell thickness in the third direction (say z), is it require to keep the cell thickness in this third direction within a limit. Or, while discretization, we have to do some special treatment for the third direction. The solver is in house 3D unstructured all speed solver. with regards, Ashwani |
|
October 1, 2015, 04:47 |
|
#2 |
Member
Kaya Onur Dag
Join Date: Apr 2013
Posts: 94
Rep Power: 13 |
depends on the way your solver is constructed
|
|
October 1, 2015, 07:43 |
|
#3 |
Senior Member
Ashwani
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Hyderabad
Posts: 154
Rep Power: 13 |
The solver is constructed for a general 3D test cases. Thus, has no special treatment for the 2D test case.
|
|
October 1, 2015, 08:38 |
|
#4 |
Member
Kaya Onur Dag
Join Date: Apr 2013
Posts: 94
Rep Power: 13 |
why don't you justt try
|
|
October 1, 2015, 08:51 |
|
#5 |
Senior Member
Filippo Maria Denaro
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 6,896
Rep Power: 73 |
you can check by setting periodic condition in the third direction, using a small slice (a couple of cells)
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
[DesignModeler] DesignModeler Scripting: How to get Full Command Access | ANT | ANSYS Meshing & Geometry | 53 | February 16, 2020 16:13 |
[ANSYS Meshing] Help with element size | sandri_92 | ANSYS Meshing & Geometry | 14 | November 14, 2018 08:54 |
Test case for compressible solver | RameshK | Main CFD Forum | 1 | January 21, 2012 12:00 |
Free surface boudary conditions with SOLA-VOF | Fan | Main CFD Forum | 10 | September 9, 2006 13:24 |
Test case for sliding mesh validation | sourabh | Main CFD Forum | 1 | February 7, 2006 19:02 |