CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > General Forums > Main CFD Forum

Should translation change eigenvalues?

Register Blogs Community New Posts Updated Threads Search

Like Tree1Likes
  • 1 Post By LuckyTran

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   September 15, 2015, 09:43
Question Should translation change eigenvalues?
  #1
Member
 
Jingchang.Shi
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Hang Zhou, China
Posts: 78
Rep Power: 14
aerosjc is on a distinguished road
Hello, everyone!

I'm working on flow instability and just a newbie. Now, I try to employ spectral method - collocation method to solve Orr-Sommerfeld(OS) equation. I've already solved the eigenvalue problem of Poiseuille flow. And I want to move to Boundary layer instability., during which I come across a problem concerning coordinates transformation. The problem is mainly a mathematical one.

Specificlly, OS equation is as follows.

(U-c)(D^{2}-\alpha^{2})\phi - U^{\prime \prime}\phi = \frac{1}{i \alpha Re} (D^{4}-2\alpha^{2}D^{2}+\alpha^{4})\phi

Mean velocity profile of Poiseuille flow is U = 1 - x^{2}, -1 <= x <= 1.

What I concerns is c, wave speed, also eigenvalue. I treat OS equation as a general eigenvalue problem, which leads OS equation to be of the form A \phi = c B \phi, where both A and B are operators.

A = \frac{-1}{\alpha Re} (D^4 - 2 \alpha^2 D^2 + \alpha^4) + i U (D^2 - \alpha^2) - i U^{\prime \prime}

B = i (D^2 - \alpha^2)

By some eigenvalue solver, eigenvalues can be solved. Mathematically, eigenvalues are determined by operators A and B. Ok, I finish the above.

Then I consider coordinate transformation. Take a simple example as translation: y = x + 1. It translates field from -1 \leq x \leq 1 to 0 \leq y \leq 2. Since the field is translated, operators A and B should be changed to be defined on the new field. Specifically, partial differential operator D, D^2, D^4 and velocity profile U, U^{\prime \prime} should be changed. In this case, coordinate transformation is just translation. So, partial differential operator is unchanged and velocity profile becomes U = -y^2 + 2y, U^{\prime \prime} = -2. All in all, what changes in this eigenvalue problem A \phi = c B \phi is only velocity profile. It seems operator indeed changes, which results in different eigenvalues from original ones. Then there exists contradiction.

I mean, mathematically, different operators in eigenvalue problem will lead to different eigenvalues. Meanwhile, physically, coordinate translation leads to the same eigenvalues. In fact, I do get same eigenvalues numerically by spectral method - collocation method.

So, where I am wrong from the above?

Last edited by aerosjc; September 15, 2015 at 21:26.
aerosjc is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   September 18, 2015, 20:49
Default
  #2
Senior Member
 
Lucky
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Orlando, FL USA
Posts: 5,763
Rep Power: 66
LuckyTran has a spectacular aura aboutLuckyTran has a spectacular aura aboutLuckyTran has a spectacular aura about
Quote:
Originally Posted by aerosjc View Post
I mean, mathematically, different operators in eigenvalue problem will lead to different eigenvalues. Meanwhile, physically, coordinate translation leads to the same eigenvalues. In fact, I do get same eigenvalues numerically by spectral method - collocation method.
Your coordinate transformation actually did not change the operator. What changed is the representation of the operator with respect to the new basis (the new coordinates). The actual transformation was not affected, only the way you refer to them has changed. So actually you do get the same eigenvalues. Although the new operator looks different than the original operator, that is because of the change in coordinates (the physics stayed the same but expressed in new coordinates).

Your eigenvectors will look different in the new basis, but it is the same vector (you still have the same velocity profile, but it is expressed differently in your new variables). Scalars are not transformed so your eigenvalues in the new basis are the same as the old eigenvalues. During the coordinate transformation, the A and B will change along with the eigenvectors but the eigenvalues will remain the same.

Last edited by LuckyTran; September 18, 2015 at 22:34.
LuckyTran is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   September 18, 2015, 21:07
Default
  #3
Member
 
Jingchang.Shi
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Hang Zhou, China
Posts: 78
Rep Power: 14
aerosjc is on a distinguished road
Yes. I later realized that operator did not change under this circumstance.

However, if the coordinate transformation is more complex, like y = \frac{1}{2} (x + 1), do eigenvalues change? Due to the coefficient \frac{1}{2}, the mean velocity profile changes and operators are multiplied by coefficients.
aerosjc is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   September 18, 2015, 21:57
Default
  #4
Senior Member
 
Lucky
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Orlando, FL USA
Posts: 5,763
Rep Power: 66
LuckyTran has a spectacular aura aboutLuckyTran has a spectacular aura aboutLuckyTran has a spectacular aura about
Quote:
Originally Posted by aerosjc View Post
Yes. I later realized that operator did not change under this circumstance.

However, if the coordinate transformation is more complex, like y = \frac{1}{2} (x + 1), do eigenvalues change? Due to the coefficient \frac{1}{2}, the mean velocity profile changes and operators are multiplied by coefficients.
Yes and no.

Under linear transformation theory with this coordinate transformation, the vectors become stretched and so the eigenvalues do change. Recall that the eigenvalues tell you how much the eigenvector is stretched by the transformation. Before the eigenvalues were constant because a translation cannot stretch a vector, but stretching the coordinates can stretch a vector and hence change an eigenvalue (the eigenvalue is a measure of stretch).

However, if you generalize the definition of eigenvalues to nonlinear systems, then you can find these non-linear eigenvalues which are invariant under non-linear coordinate transformations.
aerosjc likes this.
LuckyTran is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   September 18, 2015, 22:05
Default
  #5
Member
 
Jingchang.Shi
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Hang Zhou, China
Posts: 78
Rep Power: 14
aerosjc is on a distinguished road
Thank you!

Although I've read some math, I just forget about them when addressing some problem. I will review the invariance of eigenvalues.

For "these non-linear eigenvalues which are invariant under non-linear coordinate transformations", I need to google it.
aerosjc is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Tags
eigenvalues, orr-somerfeld, spectral method


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Thermal phase change model Piti CFX 1 January 14, 2021 11:03
Mass Transfer without Phase Change in InterPhaseChangeFoam Parisa_Khiabani OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 5 May 26, 2015 10:40
No density change - rhoSimplecFoam krapic OpenFOAM 1 November 29, 2014 19:39
Translation in Segments Kasey STAR-CCM+ 1 November 26, 2014 04:22
Help with writing a macro/UDF_file/script to change BC at regular time step intervals Codophobia Fluent Multiphase 0 April 24, 2014 11:07


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 22:11.