CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > General Forums > Main CFD Forum

Characteristic Length of a 2D NACA Airfoil

Register Blogs Community New Posts Updated Threads Search

Like Tree1Likes
  • 1 Post By aptahaney

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   July 4, 2015, 09:55
Default Characteristic Length of a 2D NACA Airfoil
  #1
New Member
 
Aidan
Join Date: Jun 2015
Posts: 17
Rep Power: 11
aptahaney is on a distinguished road
Hi,
This may seem a stupid/basic question, but I haven't found the answer as of yet, so I would very much appreciate any help that someone can offer:

I am simulating a 2D NACA 0012 airfoil for various angles of attack. Unfortunately, after a mesh convergence study, I found that at an angle of attack of 8 degrees, I am obtaining a Coefficient of Lift (Cl) of just 0.54 (Re: 6million). This is far below what I would have expected. I have tried for numerous weeks to improve the accuracy without success, and I am now starting to wonder if there is a flaw with my original understanding/parameters.

Cl is given by the formula:
Cl = Lift Force / .5*rho*v*v*A
where rho is the density of air, v is the freestream velocity, and A is the planform area.....

In the case, of a 2D airfoil, it is my understanding that "A" would be given by the chord length. In my example, the chord length of my airfoil is 1m and as it is 2D, I would use a Reference Value for the Area of just 1 in Ansys Fluent.

Similarly for the coefficient of drag (Cd):
Cd = drag Force / .5*rho*v*v*A
where rho is the density of air, v is the freestream velocity, and A is the area.....
It is my understanding that A would be 1 in this case also.

Are my assumptions correct?
If they are, I cannot see where in the above formulae I consider the overall shape of the airfoil - i.e. if I had a NACA 0012 or a NACA 0015 airfoil, both 1m in length, my assumptions above would suggest that they both have the same coefficient of lift and drag, which cannot be correct?

Thanks in advance for any help you can provide.
Aidan
adilio likes this.
aptahaney is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   July 5, 2015, 01:52
Default
  #2
Senior Member
 
Ashwani
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Hyderabad
Posts: 154
Rep Power: 13
AshwaniAssam is on a distinguished road
You are using the flow at an angle of attack. The calculation of Cl and Cd will change. If you see the controlDict file you have to change the lift and drag direction. I feel you might have missed this. you can check Pg. 12 of this pdf .
AshwaniAssam is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   July 5, 2015, 08:17
Default
  #3
Senior Member
 
Filippo Maria Denaro
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 6,882
Rep Power: 73
FMDenaro has a spectacular aura aboutFMDenaro has a spectacular aura aboutFMDenaro has a spectacular aura about
Quote:
Originally Posted by aptahaney View Post
Hi,
This may seem a stupid/basic question, but I haven't found the answer as of yet, so I would very much appreciate any help that someone can offer:

I am simulating a 2D NACA 0012 airfoil for various angles of attack. Unfortunately, after a mesh convergence study, I found that at an angle of attack of 8 degrees, I am obtaining a Coefficient of Lift (Cl) of just 0.54 (Re: 6million). This is far below what I would have expected. I have tried for numerous weeks to improve the accuracy without success, and I am now starting to wonder if there is a flaw with my original understanding/parameters.

Cl is given by the formula:
Cl = Lift Force / .5*rho*v*v*A
where rho is the density of air, v is the freestream velocity, and A is the planform area.....

In the case, of a 2D airfoil, it is my understanding that "A" would be given by the chord length. In my example, the chord length of my airfoil is 1m and as it is 2D, I would use a Reference Value for the Area of just 1 in Ansys Fluent.

Similarly for the coefficient of drag (Cd):
Cd = drag Force / .5*rho*v*v*A
where rho is the density of air, v is the freestream velocity, and A is the area.....
It is my understanding that A would be 1 in this case also.

Are my assumptions correct?
If they are, I cannot see where in the above formulae I consider the overall shape of the airfoil - i.e. if I had a NACA 0012 or a NACA 0015 airfoil, both 1m in length, my assumptions above would suggest that they both have the same coefficient of lift and drag, which cannot be correct?

Thanks in advance for any help you can provide.
Aidan


"A" should be the total surface of the airfoil, in 2D you would have the perimeter of NACA0012 x 1 (Unity of lenght in the normal-to-plane direction)
FMDenaro is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   July 6, 2015, 09:50
Default
  #4
Senior Member
 
truffaldino's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 249
Blog Entries: 5
Rep Power: 17
truffaldino is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by FMDenaro View Post
"A" should be the total surface of the airfoil, in 2D you would have the perimeter of NACA0012 x 1 (Unity of lenght in the normal-to-plane direction)
"A" must be the wing planform area, so in 2d it is the chord length.
truffaldino is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   July 6, 2015, 10:00
Default
  #5
Senior Member
 
Filippo Maria Denaro
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 6,882
Rep Power: 73
FMDenaro has a spectacular aura aboutFMDenaro has a spectacular aura aboutFMDenaro has a spectacular aura about
Quote:
Originally Posted by truffaldino View Post
"A" must be the wing planform area, so in 2d it is the chord length.

yes right, I was wrong, usually in Cl formula the planform are is denoted by S therefore in 2d is the chord lenght (x unity in spanwise)
FMDenaro is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Tags
2d airfoil flow, coefficient of lift


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Problem with airfoil shape optimization robyTKD SU2 Shape Design 7 March 7, 2022 17:18
SU2 AOA optimization 454514566@qq.com SU2 9 March 7, 2022 17:17
2D FFD Optimization RLangtry SU2 2 August 5, 2014 10:48
Problem with restart solution in shape_optimization.py robyTKD SU2 Shape Design 21 May 29, 2013 10:26
Characteristic Length Scale Thomas P. Abraham Main CFD Forum 2 April 20, 1999 18:16


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 18:42.