|
[Sponsors] |
May 23, 2008, 14:30 |
DG introduction
|
#1 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
I'm familiar with CG well (and FVM as well), but I do not have any knowledge about DG, can anyone suggest me a suitalbe an introductory reference (brief that gives concept)
|
|
May 23, 2008, 16:20 |
Re: DG introduction
|
#2 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
I like the sections on DG in Karniadakis & Sherwin `Spectral/hp element methods for CFD'. For elliptic problems, there are several inequivalent approaches with different stability, consistency, and computational properties. Arnold and others 2002 `Unified analysis of DG for elliptic problems' is a good start, but somewhat technical.
|
|
May 23, 2008, 18:47 |
Re: DG introduction
|
#3 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
B.Q. Li, 'Discontinuous Finite Elements in Fluid Dynamics and Heat Transfer', Springer 2005
|
|
May 25, 2008, 10:13 |
Re: DG introduction
|
#4 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
John,
I have received lecture notes from Bernardo Cockburn (cockburn@math.umn.edu), one of the major players in this field. You may contact him directly, or else send me your email and I'll forward it to you. ami |
|
May 25, 2008, 10:28 |
Re: DG introduction
|
#5 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
please forward a copy to me (john.dongarra@gmail.com), thanks.
|
|
May 25, 2008, 10:45 |
Re: DG introduction
|
#6 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Please find it in your mailbox.
|
|
May 25, 2008, 12:27 |
Re: DG introduction
|
#7 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Thank, but what you sent to me is not a Lecture note, but is a review paper, which is not useful for starter!
|
|
May 26, 2008, 10:45 |
Re: DG introduction
|
#8 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Well, this is what I had from him. As a last help I can offer, have a look at this ppt presentation: www.iacmm.org.il/ISCM20/DGM_ISCM20T.ppt
Hopefully, this will be helpful. |
|
May 26, 2008, 13:22 |
Re: DG introduction
|
#9 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Thanks for your knid effort.
|
|
May 27, 2008, 03:23 |
Re: DG introduction
|
#10 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
You are welcome. If it does not serve your need, the cats pictures at least are cute...
|
|
August 2, 2011, 04:20 |
|
#11 | |
New Member
Shahzada Khurram
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Rawalpindi,Pakistan
Posts: 9
Rep Power: 15 |
Quote:
|
||
August 2, 2011, 04:25 |
|
#12 |
Senior Member
cfdnewbie
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 557
Rep Power: 20 |
I've found the Book by Li not very good... why not try the Hesthaven book (has become standard in the field) or Kopriva's DGSEM? I find both of them to be much more readable as well---
|
|
August 2, 2011, 04:29 |
|
#13 |
New Member
Shahzada Khurram
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Rawalpindi,Pakistan
Posts: 9
Rep Power: 15 |
||
August 2, 2011, 04:33 |
|
#14 |
Senior Member
cfdnewbie
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 557
Rep Power: 20 |
||
August 2, 2011, 08:34 |
|
#15 |
New Member
aaaaaaaaaaaaaa
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 23
Rep Power: 15 |
For more and advanced information on modal DG method you can look the thesis of Landamann:
http://elib.uni-stuttgart.de/opus/vo...9/pdf/diss.pdf Also, if you want to understand very well the dg method you must read by books or papers the below matters: 1.Schemes of finite volumes theory (due to relation of dg with finite volumes (discontinuity at interfaces-fluxes)) 2.Riemann solvers (mainly approximate Riemann solvers) 3.Spectral & high order Elements |
|
August 2, 2011, 10:25 |
|
#16 | |
New Member
Shahzada Khurram
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Rawalpindi,Pakistan
Posts: 9
Rep Power: 15 |
Quote:
|
||
August 2, 2011, 13:38 |
|
#17 | |
Senior Member
cfdnewbie
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 557
Rep Power: 20 |
Quote:
I'd still recommend DG SEM by Kopriva for a beginner... Regarding the Riemann solvers: that depends on what you want to do with your code.... for well-resolved problems, the Riemann solvers shouldn't really matter at all, but for underresolved probs, I agree... Cheers! |
||
August 2, 2011, 17:18 |
|
#18 |
New Member
aaaaaaaaaaaaaa
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 23
Rep Power: 15 |
The choice of Riemann solver play important role for DG formulation. Is the way that an element derives information by neighbour elements.
Mainly for solutions with large gradients or discontinuities(such as shocks) the Riemann solver is crucial part due to the resolution of solution at these regions. |
|
August 2, 2011, 17:32 |
|
#19 | |
Senior Member
cfdnewbie
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 557
Rep Power: 20 |
Quote:
Sure, Riemann solver couple the system, but due to the higher polynomial approximation in the cells, jumps at interfaces tend to be much smaller than for FV... Thats why you can get away with using a cheaper Riemann solver than FV. In fact, as long as you are decently resolved, lax Friedrichs is ok most of the time! Regarding shock capturing: shocks on coarse grids are generally not captured at the grid cell interface, but within the cell!! And thats done by stabilizing with viscosity, not by the Riemann solver. So, as you see, in DG Riemann solvers play a less important role than in FV! Cheers! |
||
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
D. Choudhury. Introduction to the Renormalization | peiyong | FLUENT | 15 | September 30, 2016 00:08 |
Introduction to CFD | TerryPrice | Main CFD Forum | 3 | March 30, 2010 08:48 |
Organization of "Introduction to turbulence" | Jonas Larsson | CFD-Wiki | 3 | September 2, 2007 13:24 |
Free UK seminars: Introduction to CFD | Gavin Butcher | CFX | 0 | November 23, 2004 10:16 |
General Introduction about STAR-CD wanted! | Jason | Siemens | 3 | February 16, 2000 08:07 |