CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > General Forums > Main CFD Forum

natural convection with high temperature gradient?

Register Blogs Community New Posts Updated Threads Search

Like Tree1Likes
  • 1 Post By Rami

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   December 17, 2007, 16:45
Default natural convection with high temperature gradient?
  #1
phsieh2005
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Dear CFD experts:

I recently studies a natural convection problem (air) using Boussinesq approximation. This is an enclosure sitting in room temperature (35 degree C). Inside the enclosure, the temperature drops to 6 degree C. The cover of the enclosure is made of plastics, hence, not perfectly insulated.

Initially, everything is at 35 degree C. There is a cooling device (applied negative heat flux) to cool the inside of enclosure.

I need to apply very small delta t to keep the solution converge at each time step.

My questions are:

1. what reference temperature should I use (I used 35 degree C in my study)? 2. With high temperature gradient (29 degree C in this case), is it still a good idea to use Boussinesq approximation? 3. If not using Boussinesq approximation, then, what other alternatives there are?

Thanks for any feedback!

phsieh2005
  Reply With Quote

Old   December 18, 2007, 03:43
Default Re: natural convection with high temperature gradi
  #2
Rami
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
phsieh2005,

1. I think the choice of a reference temperature is rather arbitrary - it may be the one you chose, the mid-range tetemperature ( (6+35)/2 in your case) or anything within the expected range.

2. The Boussinesq approximation is valid when beta*deltaT << 1, where beta is the volumetric thermal expansion coefficient and deltaT is the temperature difference. In your case, using air at near standard conditions, the ideal gas model is a good approximation for estimating beta as 1/T. Using T~300K and deltaT~30K, you get beta*deltaT ~0.1 << 1, so that the Boussinesq approximation may be used.

3. If this is not the case, you may use the ideal gas equations of state to directly calculate the density as a function of the temperature and pressure (although the latter will change little in your case, I suppose).

Being myself a beginner in the natural convection area, please read my comments with some careful examination.

Rami

Amili likes this.
  Reply With Quote

Old   December 18, 2007, 04:43
Default Re: natural convection with high temperature gradi
  #3
Mayur
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Boussinesq approximation is OK in this case. small delta t may be necessary because of heat extraction and natural convection combination.
  Reply With Quote

Old   December 18, 2007, 08:57
Default Re: natural convection with high temperature gradi
  #4
phsieh2005
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Hi, Rani and Mayur,

Thanks a lot for the explanation on Boussinesq approximation!

I realized that, the problem mostly lies in the coupling between heat equation and N-S eq. This is a conjugate heat transfer problem that involves both solids and fluids. Heat equation and N-S are coupled explicitly. Is there a way to estimate delta t in a explicitly coupled case?

phsieh2005
  Reply With Quote

Old   December 19, 2007, 07:25
Default Re: natural convection with high temperature gradi
  #5
Mayur
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
I don't think there is any such relation in the present case(apart from what you s/w may calculate on its own).
  Reply With Quote

Old   September 23, 2015, 09:25
Default
  #6
New Member
 
ali
Join Date: Jul 2015
Posts: 1
Rep Power: 0
Amili is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rami
;53114
phsieh2005,

1. I think the choice of a reference temperature is rather arbitrary - it may be the one you chose, the mid-range tetemperature ( (6+35)/2 in your case) or anything within the expected range.

2. The Boussinesq approximation is valid when beta*deltaT << 1, where beta is the volumetric thermal expansion coefficient and deltaT is the temperature difference. In your case, using air at near standard conditions, the ideal gas model is a good approximation for estimating beta as 1/T. Using T~300K and deltaT~30K, you get beta*deltaT ~0.1 << 1, so that the Boussinesq approximation may be used.

3. If this is not the case, you may use the ideal gas equations of state to directly calculate the density as a function of the temperature and pressure (although the latter will change little in your case, I suppose).

Being myself a beginner in the natural convection area, please read my comments with some careful examination.

Rami
I think the value of T0 is related to Ro0(density)? for example for air, if the density (Ro0) is selected 1.225 kg/m3, the value of T0 is around 288 K.
Amili is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Very simple natural convection problem Naseem FLUENT 19 December 17, 2020 17:00
Temperature contour VS velocity contour - Natural convection Yr0gErG FLUENT 0 April 1, 2011 23:32
Natural Convection NormalVector FLUENT 0 November 5, 2010 18:06
natural convection at high Rayleigh mauricio FLUENT 2 February 23, 2005 20:43
Approximate Mixing due to Natural Convection Greg Perkins Main CFD Forum 0 February 12, 2003 19:43


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 23:27.