|
[Sponsors] |
natural convection with high temperature gradient? |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
December 17, 2007, 16:45 |
natural convection with high temperature gradient?
|
#1 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Dear CFD experts:
I recently studies a natural convection problem (air) using Boussinesq approximation. This is an enclosure sitting in room temperature (35 degree C). Inside the enclosure, the temperature drops to 6 degree C. The cover of the enclosure is made of plastics, hence, not perfectly insulated. Initially, everything is at 35 degree C. There is a cooling device (applied negative heat flux) to cool the inside of enclosure. I need to apply very small delta t to keep the solution converge at each time step. My questions are: 1. what reference temperature should I use (I used 35 degree C in my study)? 2. With high temperature gradient (29 degree C in this case), is it still a good idea to use Boussinesq approximation? 3. If not using Boussinesq approximation, then, what other alternatives there are? Thanks for any feedback! phsieh2005 |
|
December 18, 2007, 03:43 |
Re: natural convection with high temperature gradi
|
#2 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
phsieh2005,
1. I think the choice of a reference temperature is rather arbitrary - it may be the one you chose, the mid-range tetemperature ( (6+35)/2 in your case) or anything within the expected range. 2. The Boussinesq approximation is valid when beta*deltaT << 1, where beta is the volumetric thermal expansion coefficient and deltaT is the temperature difference. In your case, using air at near standard conditions, the ideal gas model is a good approximation for estimating beta as 1/T. Using T~300K and deltaT~30K, you get beta*deltaT ~0.1 << 1, so that the Boussinesq approximation may be used. 3. If this is not the case, you may use the ideal gas equations of state to directly calculate the density as a function of the temperature and pressure (although the latter will change little in your case, I suppose). Being myself a beginner in the natural convection area, please read my comments with some careful examination. Rami |
|
December 18, 2007, 04:43 |
Re: natural convection with high temperature gradi
|
#3 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Boussinesq approximation is OK in this case. small delta t may be necessary because of heat extraction and natural convection combination.
|
|
December 18, 2007, 08:57 |
Re: natural convection with high temperature gradi
|
#4 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Hi, Rani and Mayur,
Thanks a lot for the explanation on Boussinesq approximation! I realized that, the problem mostly lies in the coupling between heat equation and N-S eq. This is a conjugate heat transfer problem that involves both solids and fluids. Heat equation and N-S are coupled explicitly. Is there a way to estimate delta t in a explicitly coupled case? phsieh2005 |
|
December 19, 2007, 07:25 |
Re: natural convection with high temperature gradi
|
#5 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
I don't think there is any such relation in the present case(apart from what you s/w may calculate on its own).
|
|
September 23, 2015, 09:25 |
|
#6 | |
New Member
ali
Join Date: Jul 2015
Posts: 1
Rep Power: 0 |
Quote:
|
||
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Very simple natural convection problem | Naseem | FLUENT | 19 | December 17, 2020 17:00 |
Temperature contour VS velocity contour - Natural convection | Yr0gErG | FLUENT | 0 | April 1, 2011 23:32 |
Natural Convection | NormalVector | FLUENT | 0 | November 5, 2010 18:06 |
natural convection at high Rayleigh | mauricio | FLUENT | 2 | February 23, 2005 20:43 |
Approximate Mixing due to Natural Convection | Greg Perkins | Main CFD Forum | 0 | February 12, 2003 19:43 |