|
[Sponsors] |
January 24, 2014, 08:48 |
CFD or experimental?
|
#1 |
New Member
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 19
Rep Power: 12 |
Hi!
I'm a master's student in fluid mechanics and I am about to start my thesis soon. I have received two offers in industry, one on PIV and one on CFD. I've done CFD previously and I've also done some hotwire measurements in wind tunnels as well. I'm a bit unsure of what to choose, I like the CFD field more but it might be good to have some experience in experimental fluid mechanics aswell. What are your opinions? |
|
January 24, 2014, 11:24 |
|
#2 |
Member
|
I think Experimental option is better when compared to CFD. CFD can be learnt or implemented any time but PIV set-up needs lots of funds and missing an opportunity is not a good idea.
|
|
January 24, 2014, 14:05 |
|
#3 |
Senior Member
cfdnewbie
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 557
Rep Power: 20 |
While this is a good advice and a valid point, I would suggest going with what interests you most. In case you want to do a PhD afterwards, it is important to truly find out what can keep you motivated and interested for 5+ years.
|
|
January 24, 2014, 19:22 |
|
#4 |
New Member
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 19
Rep Power: 12 |
I'm not planning to pursue a PhD but looking to work in industry. Here's the dilemma. I mainly want to work with CFD as a main tool, how is the balance in industry, does the majority of fluids people work with CFD or is it 50/50? Would having 6 months of CFD-ing or 6 months of experimental studies give me an advantage when looking for CFD jobs?
That was a lot of questions |
|
January 25, 2014, 05:24 |
|
#5 |
Senior Member
|
It is not an easy choice but choosing one doesn't mean excluding the other. You can start with experimental and then move to CFD. From my experience, doing the other way around is a little bit more difficult.
We all know what are the main advantages of CFD or Wind tunnel testing in terms of accuracy and final results. In terms of working environment, the wind tunnel is more tiring under a physical point of view and doesn't give you a clear overview of the flow. CFD is more tiring under a mental point of view and it involves spending lots of hours sitting at a desk. Then anyways everything also depends on what your application will be both for the WT or CFD. |
|
Tags |
cfd, experiment |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
CFD Design...The CFD Future | John C. Chien | Main CFD Forum | 20 | November 20, 2015 00:40 |
Comparing wind tunnel tests costs with CFD | Freeman | Main CFD Forum | 9 | January 30, 2006 09:02 |
CFD for fans & blower housings | David Carroll | Main CFD Forum | 8 | August 24, 2000 18:25 |
Which is better to develop in-house CFD code or to buy a available CFD package. | Tareq Al-shaalan | Main CFD Forum | 10 | June 13, 1999 00:27 |
CFD experimental validation | Massimiliano Gasparetti | Main CFD Forum | 5 | November 24, 1998 08:07 |