|
[Sponsors] |
October 8, 2013, 10:27 |
Bubble plume simulation, multi phase flow
|
#1 |
New Member
Dinanath Sharma
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: India
Posts: 10
Rep Power: 13 |
I'm trying to simulate a bubble plume in a water tank (cubical). My simulation is yielding results close to that determined experimentally, when my plume injection point is at the center of the cube. But when I inject from closer to the wall (to study the Wall effects), the simulation results differ from the experimental ones. Can someone tell me what additional physics I might be missing? (Do I need to fine tune certain parameters, while simulating for the wall effects?) I have adjusted the meshing to include a higher resolution near the wall.
PS: I'm not using turbulence modeling in the simulation. Thanks in advance! Last edited by Artvandelay; October 8, 2013 at 10:34. Reason: Forgot to add a point |
|
December 31, 2014, 09:38 |
|
#2 |
Member
Davi Barreira
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Fortaleza
Posts: 76
Rep Power: 12 |
Hello, I know it has been a while since you posted this, but did you manage to get the simulation working properly?Im also trying to simulate a bubble plume, but my results are not matching the experimental results. Right now Im trying to replicate the results present in the work of Dhotre and Smith (2007), entitled "CFD simulation of large-scale bubble plumes: Comparisons against experiments". My model seems to be overestimating the values of void fraction and the profile is not being a gaussian.
p.s:Im using axial symmetry. |
|
January 1, 2015, 14:55 |
|
#3 |
New Member
Dinanath Sharma
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: India
Posts: 10
Rep Power: 13 |
Hey, I was actually not able to validate my results with the experimental findings. Initially I thought I got it correctly, but then I realized that there is a mismatch. While I am able to predict the structure of the plume with the one taken by the experimental one, I am not able to match the 2 structures in terms of scales. Besides I didn't use the 2 liquid model. I used eulerian-lagrangian formulation without any turbulence modeling (which is probably the reason for the mismatch). I did not use axial symmetry. So, sorry for that.
|
|
January 1, 2015, 18:11 |
|
#4 |
Member
Davi Barreira
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Fortaleza
Posts: 76
Rep Power: 12 |
Thanks for your reply!
|
|
May 5, 2017, 06:42 |
Need Your Support
|
#5 |
New Member
Saugata Dutta Roy
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 1
Rep Power: 0 |
Sir, I am simulating bubble plume condition using Eulerian model. I find, air velocity just some distance after the injector is very high. For rest of the domain, it is matching test data. I am injecting air at a velocity of 0.05 M/Sec. However, I get air/water velocity as high as 2.5 M/Sec immediately after injection point. Can you help me with your definition file in Fluent or take my setup to review and provide some suggestion.
|
|
August 23, 2018, 04:52 |
|
#6 |
New Member
Soheil
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Helsinki
Posts: 21
Rep Power: 12 |
Hi,
Would you please tell me how did you manage to "inject air" in fluent? There is one injection option in Discrete Phase section, with injection types of single, cone, etc. I am trying to inject some liquid inside a tank [Link], and wondering is this the only way? Thanks, Regards |
|
Tags |
bubble column, lagrange particle |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Differences and functions of Solidworks Simulation and Solidworks Flow Simulation? | alpharays | Main CFD Forum | 0 | April 19, 2012 04:13 |
two phase flow steady VOF simulation | yoyoyona | ANSYS | 0 | March 4, 2012 07:09 |
Simulation of a complex wing in solidworks flow simulation | niels1900 | FloEFD, FloWorks & FloTHERM | 6 | April 20, 2011 11:44 |
Three phase flow simulation | Gitesh P | Main CFD Forum | 1 | December 22, 2010 21:59 |
Solid-Liquid Two Phase Flow Numerical Simulation with the Finite Element Method | Qing Hao | Main CFD Forum | 2 | January 9, 1999 00:31 |