CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > General Forums > Main CFD Forum

Backward Facing Step Flow

Register Blogs Community New Posts Updated Threads Search

Like Tree1Likes
  • 1 Post By Ardalan

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   July 14, 2013, 11:51
Unhappy Backward Facing Step Flow
  #1
Member
 
Ardalan
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Baku
Posts: 50
Rep Power: 16
Ardalan is on a distinguished road
Hello to everyone
I've written a code to simulate laminar backward facing step flow. The main features of the method I have developed are as follows:
- incompressible flow
- finite volume
- Simple algorithm on Staggered grids
- 1st order Upwinding for convection terms
- central differencing for diffusion terms
- Iterative solution to obtain steady solution (no time marching)
- using line TDMA for the solution of algebraic equations of x-y momentum and pressure correction
at lower Reynolds numbers the code works satisfactorily but at higher Reynolds numbers (e.g. 600, 800) the L2 norm of mass unbalance decreases 1 or 2 order of magnitudes, then it oscillates but doesn't decrease further.
I have checked the Residuals, the cells where the mass unbalance doesn't decrease, are located near the end of lower wake.
I have tested the code for simulating cavity driven flow, it works fine.
Does anybody have any suggestion? What shall I do? Does the flow have unsteady nature at high Reynolds numbers?
ramakant likes this.
Ardalan is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   July 14, 2013, 16:15
Default
  #2
Senior Member
 
Filippo Maria Denaro
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 6,897
Rep Power: 73
FMDenaro has a spectacular aura aboutFMDenaro has a spectacular aura aboutFMDenaro has a spectacular aura about
yes, after Re=700- 800 the flow is transitional and it has no sense the 2D laminar solution. You can search for a paper of Armaly et al. on JFM
FMDenaro is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   August 18, 2013, 12:58
Default
  #3
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 272
Rep Power: 16
leflix is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ardalan View Post
Hello to everyone

- Iterative solution to obtain steady solution (no time marching)

For Re=600, 800 the flow is not anymore steady and is definitely unsteady.
So it is normal that your code can not find a steady solution of a flow which is unsteady.

So implement unsteady version of your solver accounting for time derivative.
refine the grid because you increase the Reynolds and re-run it,it should be fine.
leflix is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   August 21, 2013, 09:54
Default
  #4
Member
 
Ardalan
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Baku
Posts: 50
Rep Power: 16
Ardalan is on a distinguished road
Thanks a lot
I have another question regarding the flow over a backward step:
How can I calculate the reattachment region length?
Ardalan is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   August 21, 2013, 10:22
Default
  #5
Super Moderator
 
flotus1's Avatar
 
Alex
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Germany
Posts: 3,428
Rep Power: 49
flotus1 has a spectacular aura aboutflotus1 has a spectacular aura about
The reattatchment point is usually defined by the position where the wall shear stress (its streamwise component) changes sign.
flotus1 is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
help with supersonic flow over duct with backward step quiqui FLUENT 1 May 9, 2013 12:13
Upgraded from Karmic Koala 9.10 to Lucid Lynx10.04.3 bookie56 OpenFOAM Installation 8 August 13, 2011 05:03
air-fuel mixing in backward facing step abdullahkarimi Main CFD Forum 0 March 19, 2011 19:39
Turbulent flow over a backward facing step Jenner Main CFD Forum 1 December 2, 2006 12:21
Inviscid flow over a forward/backward facing step Abhijit Tilak Main CFD Forum 3 February 16, 2005 10:18


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 22:38.