CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > General Forums > Main CFD Forum

Difference between Compressible CFD solver and Incompressible CFD solver

Register Blogs Community New Posts Updated Threads Search

Like Tree1Likes
  • 1 Post By julien.decharentenay

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   September 22, 2012, 15:21
Default Difference between Compressible CFD solver and Incompressible CFD solver
  #1
New Member
 
Arijit Hazra
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 14
Rep Power: 15
arijith is on a distinguished road
I am a student of CFD.I found one thing really confusing about CFD. Compressible CFD solvers are said to be different from incompressible CFD solver.Most books and lectures cover incompressible flow CFD part.I want to know the fundamental difference between Compressible and Incompressible CFd solver.

Is it possible to develope a flow solver which can be applied for solving both incompressible and compresible?
arijith is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   September 22, 2012, 15:25
Default
  #2
New Member
 
Arijit Hazra
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 14
Rep Power: 15
arijith is on a distinguished road
In compressible flow solver if I use Favre avarageing ,Jameson algorithm (an explicit method with artificial diffusion for shock capturing)and FVM. Why can it not be used for solving flow for which Mach Number is below 0.3.?
arijith is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   September 22, 2012, 16:01
Default
  #3
New Member
 
Trần Đình Thắng
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Moscow Russia, Hanoi Vietnam
Posts: 24
Rep Power: 14
mp121209 is on a distinguished road
Send a message via ICQ to mp121209 Send a message via Yahoo to mp121209 Send a message via Skype™ to mp121209
The compressible effects must be considered when the density field varies widely. A incompressible solver cannot be used to solve any compressible problems. In contrast to this, a compressible must give the same solution as incompressible one when compressibility can be neglected.
mp121209 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   September 22, 2012, 16:13
Default
  #4
New Member
 
Arijit Hazra
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 14
Rep Power: 15
arijith is on a distinguished road
you mean to say in a compressible flow solver if mach number ranges from 0 to 0.3 it should reproduce the incompressible flow solver results but is there any problem if we use an explicit compressible flow solver with Jameson Algorithm for shock capturing for incompressible flow prediction keeping Mach number below 0.3?
arijith is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   September 22, 2012, 17:29
Default
  #5
New Member
 
Trần Đình Thắng
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Moscow Russia, Hanoi Vietnam
Posts: 24
Rep Power: 14
mp121209 is on a distinguished road
Send a message via ICQ to mp121209 Send a message via Yahoo to mp121209 Send a message via Skype™ to mp121209
There aren't any shock-waves formed in the flow with Mach in the range as you said. Jameson shock capturing method work well on the shocks, but it is no problem to use the method in the flow without shocks.
In subsonic flow there are only sonic waves, not shock waves.
mp121209 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   September 23, 2012, 05:01
Default
  #6
Senior Member
 
Filippo Maria Denaro
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 6,896
Rep Power: 73
FMDenaro has a spectacular aura aboutFMDenaro has a spectacular aura aboutFMDenaro has a spectacular aura about
The first issue is the mathematical form of the governing equation for compressible and incompressible flows, not the focus on the solver ...
This is the key you have first to study ... then you will be more confident with CFD solver...
FMDenaro is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   September 23, 2012, 20:23
Default
  #7
Senior Member
 
Julien de Charentenay
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Australia
Posts: 231
Rep Power: 18
julien.decharentenay is on a distinguished road
Send a message via Skype™ to julien.decharentenay
One of the reason of the distinction between compressible and incompressible solvers relates to numerical methods:

- compressible solvers have eigenvalues equal to: u-c, u and u+c where u is the velocity and c the speed of sound;
- incompressible solvers typically have eigenvalues equal to u.

At low mach number, there is a large disparity between the eigenvalues for compressible solver (meaning, the solver has to work harder), but with little to no benefits.

In short: a compressible solver can be used to solve incompressible flows but it will take longer than an incompressible one.

Julien
suktan likes this.
__________________
---
Julien de Charentenay

Last edited by julien.decharentenay; September 23, 2012 at 20:24. Reason: Rephrased eigenvalue part to be more accurate.
julien.decharentenay is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Creating New Solver: For particle-laden compressible jets sankarv OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 17 December 3, 2014 20:41
Creating New Solver: For particle-laden compressible jets sankarv OpenFOAM 0 April 4, 2010 19:06
Can a compressible solver solve incompressible ? jinwon park Main CFD Forum 17 December 13, 2007 06:00
compressible two phase flow in CFX4.4 youngan CFX 0 July 2, 2003 00:32
Mesh generator and CFD solver Gennady Kireyko Main CFD Forum 0 May 6, 2001 12:13


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 17:22.