|
[Sponsors] |
November 21, 2019, 22:31 |
CFD workstation 2x E5-2680
|
#1 |
New Member
FB
Join Date: May 2018
Posts: 6
Rep Power: 8 |
I'm evaluating 2 options for a home CFD workstation for similar prices (I've found good deals for about $1,600-$1,700):
CPU: 2x Intel Xeon E5-2680 V3 (2.5-3.3GHz) -12C RAM: 64GB DDR4 RAM HDD: 240GB SSD & 1TB SATA HDD (Data Drive) OR CPU: 2x Intel Xeon E5-2667 V3 (3.2-3.6GHz) - 8C RAM: 64GB DDR4 RAM HDD: 512GB SSD The first option seems like the obvious choice but my question relates mainly with the balance between having more cores but worst CPU clock speed. How would this affect performance and how to find a balance? PS: Would you recommend any alternatives to the ones above? Thanks |
|
November 24, 2019, 13:01 |
|
#2 |
Super Moderator
Alex
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Germany
Posts: 3,427
Rep Power: 49 |
If you have the licenses for running 24 threads, or don't need licenses at all, then the first machine will be faster for solving in parallel. 50% more cores make up for slightly lower clock speeds.
Make sure the 64GB of RAM come in an 8x8GBconfiguration, so all memory channels are populated. I can't think of any better alternatives in this price range. |
|
Tags |
build, cfd, e5-2667, e5-2680, workstation |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
On the CFD market and trends | sbaffini | Main CFD Forum | 14 | June 13, 2017 12:48 |
ASME CFD Symposium - Call for Papers | Chris Kleijn | Main CFD Forum | 0 | September 25, 2001 11:17 |
What is the Better Way to Do CFD? | John C. Chien | Main CFD Forum | 54 | April 23, 2001 09:10 |
PC vs. Workstation | Tim Franke | Main CFD Forum | 5 | September 29, 1999 16:01 |
Which is better to develop in-house CFD code or to buy a available CFD package. | Tareq Al-shaalan | Main CFD Forum | 10 | June 13, 1999 00:27 |