CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > ANSYS > FLUENT

SST kw model

Register Blogs Community New Posts Updated Threads Search

Like Tree1Likes
  • 1 Post By cfd seeker

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   March 2, 2012, 10:16
Default SST kw model
  #1
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Germany
Posts: 552
Rep Power: 20
cfd seeker is on a distinguished road
Hi all
what will be the consequences if we are using a mesh with y+=5-30 using SST kw in fluent 13 at 4 deg and 12 deg angle of attack? and what will be the consequences if we are using the same mesh at same conditions using Realizable k-e model?
Regards
jzc likes this.
cfd seeker is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   March 2, 2012, 11:42
Default
  #2
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Germany
Posts: 552
Rep Power: 20
cfd seeker is on a distinguished road
any body comment please.........
cfd seeker is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   March 3, 2012, 12:35
Default
  #3
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Germany
Posts: 552
Rep Power: 20
cfd seeker is on a distinguished road
Far where r u lost?? you are lot of experience in this field.......
cfd seeker is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   March 3, 2012, 15:09
Default
  #4
Far
Senior Member
 
Sijal
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Islamabad
Posts: 4,558
Blog Entries: 6
Rep Power: 54
Far has a spectacular aura aboutFar has a spectacular aura about
Send a message via Skype™ to Far
Quote:
what will be the consequences if we are using a mesh with y+=5-30 using SST kw in fluent 13 at 4 deg and 12 deg angle of attack? and what will be the consequences if we are using the same mesh at same conditions using Realizable k-e model?
The results should be similar at 4 and 12 deg for the y+ = 1 and 5-30 if there is no separation. But may start to deviate for y+ 10-30 in comparison to y+ = 1 and 5-10 if separation occurs. According to claim made for the automatic wall treatment it should give you same result for y+ upto 100. But in reality it is not true. If needed I can send you the papers regarding this issue.
Far is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   March 3, 2012, 22:08
Default
  #5
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Germany
Posts: 552
Rep Power: 20
cfd seeker is on a distinguished road
Thank you very much Far for your concern, I really appreciate it. Yes papers would have been great help to me, please mail me at yasirforfriends@yahoo.com and by separation you just mean flow separation or you mean stall. Actually in my case, there is flow separation at 12 degree AOA but the wing is not stalling. What exactly you are talking about?
cfd seeker is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   March 3, 2012, 23:10
Default
  #6
Far
Senior Member
 
Sijal
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Islamabad
Posts: 4,558
Blog Entries: 6
Rep Power: 54
Far has a spectacular aura aboutFar has a spectacular aura about
Send a message via Skype™ to Far
Quote:
Originally Posted by cfd seeker View Post
by separation you just mean flow separation or you mean stall. Actually in my case, there is flow separation at 12 degree AOA but the wing is not stalling. What exactly you are talking about?
I mean separation and for massive separation/stall better model would be the Differential Reynolds stress model, DES and/or LES. As you know, RANS models assume that the turbulence is isotrpic.

Last edited by Far; March 3, 2012 at 23:52.
Far is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   March 4, 2012, 05:33
Default
  #7
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Germany
Posts: 552
Rep Power: 20
cfd seeker is on a distinguished road
So it means even if at 12 degree AOA, wing is not stalling but we have to have wall y+ =1-10 to properly capture the physics of the flow and to get good estimate of CL and CD values right?
cfd seeker is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   March 4, 2012, 05:44
Default
  #8
Far
Senior Member
 
Sijal
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Islamabad
Posts: 4,558
Blog Entries: 6
Rep Power: 54
Far has a spectacular aura aboutFar has a spectacular aura about
Send a message via Skype™ to Far
Quote:
So it means even if at 12 degree AOA, wing is not stalling but we have to have wall y+ =1-10 to properly capture the physics of the flow and to get good estimate of CL and CD values right?
Yes, It is true based on the published results.

But to be sure for your case, you need to run the case with at least two y+ values or probably three i.e. y+ = 1, 10 and 30 for such extreme condition.

Rule of thumb is not meant for the final solution, it just guide you to the destination with minimum hassle, otherwise to be confident, you have to still make some checks for your case.

Also you need to ensure that boundary layer contains at least 10-15 nodes for automatic wall treatment.

I am sending you relevant Journal papers, in order to gain more insight to what I am referring.
Far is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   March 4, 2012, 05:49
Default
  #9
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Germany
Posts: 552
Rep Power: 20
cfd seeker is on a distinguished road
thanks alot Far for your concern. Kindly mail me that papers, i have given yahoo id in the above posts
cfd seeker is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   September 21, 2012, 11:38
Default
  #10
Senior Member
 
Ehsan Asgari
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 473
Rep Power: 18
syavash is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by Far View Post
Yes, It is true based on the published results.

But to be sure for your case, you need to run the case with at least two y+ values or probably three i.e. y+ = 1, 10 and 30 for such extreme condition.

Rule of thumb is not meant for the final solution, it just guide you to the destination with minimum hassle, otherwise to be confident, you have to still make some checks for your case.

Also you need to ensure that boundary layer contains at least 10-15 nodes for automatic wall treatment.

I am sending you relevant Journal papers, in order to gain more insight to what I am referring.
Dear Far,

May you please send me the papers you've discussed above?
My E-mail is syavash_azna@yahoo.com
Tnx in advance.
syavash is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   September 21, 2012, 13:08
Default
  #11
Member
 
Chris, Kam
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Busan, South Korea
Posts: 42
Rep Power: 16
cartman is on a distinguished road
Dear Far,,,,

I would appreciate your advise

I don't want to bother you, but...

Could you give me the paper please?

That paper seems very useful for my investigation

My e-mail adress is hdkam@pknul.ac.kr
cartman is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   September 21, 2012, 13:13
Default
  #12
Far
Senior Member
 
Sijal
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Islamabad
Posts: 4,558
Blog Entries: 6
Rep Power: 54
Far has a spectacular aura aboutFar has a spectacular aura about
Send a message via Skype™ to Far
Quote:
Originally Posted by cartman View Post
Dear Far,,,,

I would appreciate your advise

I don't want to bother you, but...

Could you give me the paper please?

That paper seems very useful for my investigation

My e-mail adress is hdkam@pknul.ac.kr
pls confirm your email address
Far is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   September 21, 2012, 13:29
Default
  #13
Senior Member
 
Ehsan Asgari
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 473
Rep Power: 18
syavash is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by Far View Post
pls confirm your email address
My E-mail address is syavash_azna@yahoo.com

tnx again.
syavash is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   September 22, 2012, 15:27
Default sent
  #14
Far
Senior Member
 
Sijal
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Islamabad
Posts: 4,558
Blog Entries: 6
Rep Power: 54
Far has a spectacular aura aboutFar has a spectacular aura about
Send a message via Skype™ to Far
Please check your email.
Far is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   September 22, 2012, 15:31
Default
  #15
Far
Senior Member
 
Sijal
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Islamabad
Posts: 4,558
Blog Entries: 6
Rep Power: 54
Far has a spectacular aura aboutFar has a spectacular aura about
Send a message via Skype™ to Far
I am getting this error

Quote:
Delivery to the following recipient failed permanently:

hdkam@pknul.ac.kr

Technical details of permanent failure:
DNS Error: Domain name not found
Far is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Near wall treatment in k-omega SST Arnoldinho OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 38 March 8, 2017 14:48
why SST model??? vijay CFX 3 May 22, 2008 04:05
Convergence issue in SST for Porous model Raj CFX 0 May 2, 2008 03:43
SST model and boundary layers Rodrigo Basniak CFX 7 March 27, 2008 15:19
Stalling residuals in kw SST turbulence model jorllam CFX 3 February 13, 2007 16:51


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:15.