|
[Sponsors] |
March 2, 2012, 10:16 |
SST kw model
|
#1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Germany
Posts: 552
Rep Power: 20 |
Hi all
what will be the consequences if we are using a mesh with y+=5-30 using SST kw in fluent 13 at 4 deg and 12 deg angle of attack? and what will be the consequences if we are using the same mesh at same conditions using Realizable k-e model? Regards |
|
March 2, 2012, 11:42 |
|
#2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Germany
Posts: 552
Rep Power: 20 |
any body comment please.........
|
|
March 3, 2012, 12:35 |
|
#3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Germany
Posts: 552
Rep Power: 20 |
Far where r u lost?? you are lot of experience in this field.......
|
|
March 3, 2012, 15:09 |
|
#4 | |
Senior Member
|
Quote:
|
||
March 3, 2012, 22:08 |
|
#5 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Germany
Posts: 552
Rep Power: 20 |
Thank you very much Far for your concern, I really appreciate it. Yes papers would have been great help to me, please mail me at yasirforfriends@yahoo.com and by separation you just mean flow separation or you mean stall. Actually in my case, there is flow separation at 12 degree AOA but the wing is not stalling. What exactly you are talking about?
|
|
March 3, 2012, 23:10 |
|
#6 |
Senior Member
|
I mean separation and for massive separation/stall better model would be the Differential Reynolds stress model, DES and/or LES. As you know, RANS models assume that the turbulence is isotrpic.
Last edited by Far; March 3, 2012 at 23:52. |
|
March 4, 2012, 05:33 |
|
#7 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Germany
Posts: 552
Rep Power: 20 |
So it means even if at 12 degree AOA, wing is not stalling but we have to have wall y+ =1-10 to properly capture the physics of the flow and to get good estimate of CL and CD values right?
|
|
March 4, 2012, 05:44 |
|
#8 | |
Senior Member
|
Quote:
But to be sure for your case, you need to run the case with at least two y+ values or probably three i.e. y+ = 1, 10 and 30 for such extreme condition. Rule of thumb is not meant for the final solution, it just guide you to the destination with minimum hassle, otherwise to be confident, you have to still make some checks for your case. Also you need to ensure that boundary layer contains at least 10-15 nodes for automatic wall treatment. I am sending you relevant Journal papers, in order to gain more insight to what I am referring. |
||
March 4, 2012, 05:49 |
|
#9 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Germany
Posts: 552
Rep Power: 20 |
thanks alot Far for your concern. Kindly mail me that papers, i have given yahoo id in the above posts
|
|
September 21, 2012, 11:38 |
|
#10 | |
Senior Member
Ehsan Asgari
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 473
Rep Power: 18 |
Quote:
May you please send me the papers you've discussed above? My E-mail is syavash_azna@yahoo.com Tnx in advance. |
||
September 21, 2012, 13:08 |
|
#11 |
Member
Chris, Kam
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Busan, South Korea
Posts: 42
Rep Power: 16 |
Dear Far,,,,
I would appreciate your advise I don't want to bother you, but... Could you give me the paper please? That paper seems very useful for my investigation My e-mail adress is hdkam@pknul.ac.kr |
|
September 21, 2012, 13:13 |
|
#12 | |
Senior Member
|
Quote:
|
||
September 21, 2012, 13:29 |
|
#13 |
Senior Member
Ehsan Asgari
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 473
Rep Power: 18 |
||
September 22, 2012, 15:31 |
|
#15 | |
Senior Member
|
I am getting this error
Quote:
|
||
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Near wall treatment in k-omega SST | Arnoldinho | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 38 | March 8, 2017 14:48 |
why SST model??? | vijay | CFX | 3 | May 22, 2008 04:05 |
Convergence issue in SST for Porous model | Raj | CFX | 0 | May 2, 2008 03:43 |
SST model and boundary layers | Rodrigo Basniak | CFX | 7 | March 27, 2008 15:19 |
Stalling residuals in kw SST turbulence model | jorllam | CFX | 3 | February 13, 2007 16:51 |