CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > ANSYS > FLUENT

[DPM problem] infinite particles loop in domain (twin cyclone - double cyclone))

Register Blogs Community New Posts Updated Threads Search

Like Tree1Likes
  • 1 Post By ghost82

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   November 12, 2011, 14:04
Default [DPM problem] infinite particles loop in domain (twin cyclone - double cyclone))
  #1
Senior Member
 
ghost82's Avatar
 
Rick
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 1,016
Rep Power: 27
ghost82 will become famous soon enough
Good morning all,
I'm simulating a double cyclone system (twin cyclone), to separate a stream of particles (ash) from a fluegas.
The model consists of about 2.300.000 cells. Model is steady k-epsilon RNG with swirl dominated flow, no energy equation, incompressible gas. After about 4.000 iterations I stopped the simulations, residuals were all constant and under 10^-3 except continuity which was around 1*10^-2; however inlet and outlet mass flows were identical, and velocity and pressure profiles seem to be ok.

After that I enabled the DPM model to track my particles (steady) and to see the global efficiency.
So I set up multiple surface injections (at inlet) (I didn't use the Rosin-Rammler distribution) for each size of particles (I tried 5 - 15 - 82 and 2500 microns) and set the number of steps to an initial value of 200.000.
Outlet was setup as an escape boundary, dust collector (below cyclones) was setup as a trap boundary, all the other walls were setup as reflect (reflection condition --> normal -->constant=0,8, tangent-->constant=0,8).

However I saw a 100% incomplete path for all the injected sizes (except the 5 microns size), as you can see in the attached pictures (in picture I changed the injection type from surface to point).
I increased the number of steps till 5.000.000 but the results are the same: particles recirculate in the domain, without exiting or being trapped.
Pictures with tracked particles are all calculated with 1.000.000 steps.

What does this mean?It cannot be real an infinite loop of the particles.

Thank you for any replies

Daniele
Attached Images
File Type: png 1.png (61.2 KB, 129 views)
File Type: jpg 2-15micron.jpg (33.1 KB, 131 views)
File Type: jpg 3-82micron.jpg (33.0 KB, 108 views)
File Type: jpg 4-2500micron.jpg (34.0 KB, 112 views)
File Type: jpg 5-5micron.jpg (37.0 KB, 109 views)

Last edited by ghost82; November 12, 2011 at 14:22.
ghost82 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   November 14, 2011, 08:48
Default
  #2
Senior Member
 
ghost82's Avatar
 
Rick
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 1,016
Rep Power: 27
ghost82 will become famous soon enough
Found my answer in article "NUMERICAL STUDY OF GAS-SOLID FLOW IN A CYCLONE SEPARATOR"

Quote:
The particles with diameters of 2×10-6m and 7×10-6m can spin down to the conical section of cyclone and then should be collected while the bigger particles with diameter of 3×10-5m and 1×10-4m spin downward first and then keep spinning near the wall at a certain horizontal level.
There is therefore a critical value to distinguish the flow pattern of particles of different diameters. If the particle diameter is larger than the critical value, the particle will keep a circular motion in the cone of cyclone. In contrast, if the particle diameter is less than this critical value, the particles will be collected directly or escape from the cyclone.[...]
In the real industry, these bigger particles will be eventually collected due to their interactions with other particles.
ghost82 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   December 28, 2015, 10:09
Default
  #3
New Member
 
elham
Join Date: Dec 2015
Posts: 4
Rep Power: 10
emka is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by ghost82 View Post
Found my answer in article "NUMERICAL STUDY OF GAS-SOLID FLOW IN A CYCLONE SEPARATOR"
Hi Daniele
I am simulating a cement cyclone and faced with the same problem as you mentioned, that particles with diameter more than 50 micron keep spinning at a level of cyclone.
how can I reach a realistic result as the real cyclone in factory has 83 percent efficiency factor, but mine is less than 10% because most of the particles remain in cyclone.
Thanks for any reply and consideration.
emka is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   December 28, 2015, 10:13
Default
  #4
Senior Member
 
ghost82's Avatar
 
Rick
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 1,016
Rep Power: 27
ghost82 will become famous soon enough
Hi,
consider incomplete particles as trapped particles: as I wrote that particles will interact with other particles and they will probably spin down and collected.
__________________
Google is your friend and the same for the search button!
ghost82 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   December 28, 2015, 10:27
Default
  #5
New Member
 
elham
Join Date: Dec 2015
Posts: 4
Rep Power: 10
emka is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by ghost82 View Post
Hi,
consider incomplete particles as trapped particles: as I wrote that particles will interact with other particles and they will probably spin down and collected.
thanks for reply
I got your note,but there is 200 pascal difference in droplet pressure of real cyclone and stimulated one that I guess is due to the thing I mentioned, How can I valid my stimulation?
emka is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   December 28, 2015, 10:33
Default
  #6
Senior Member
 
ghost82's Avatar
 
Rick
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 1,016
Rep Power: 27
ghost82 will become famous soon enough
I think this is more related to turbulence model; if you didn't do it, simulate with reynolds stress model (better), or k-epsilon RNG with swirl activated.
emka likes this.
__________________
Google is your friend and the same for the search button!
ghost82 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   May 19, 2020, 15:19
Default
  #7
New Member
 
mohamad ali mirzaei
Join Date: Feb 2017
Posts: 27
Rep Power: 9
mohamadalimirzaei1994 is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by emka View Post
Hi Daniele
I am simulating a cement cyclone and faced with the same problem as you mentioned, that particles with diameter more than 50 micron keep spinning at a level of cyclone.
how can I reach a realistic result as the real cyclone in factory has 83 percent efficiency factor, but mine is less than 10% because most of the particles remain in cyclone.
Thanks for any reply and consideration.
Hi Elham,
I am facing the same problem (particles remaining at a certain level), could you overcome this? How?

Thanks
mohamadalimirzaei1994 is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Continuing User Defined Real Gas Model issues aeroman FLUENT 6 April 8, 2016 04:34
New densitybased solver AeroFoam giulio_romanelli OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 48 January 15, 2016 09:20
Missing math.h header Travis FLUENT 4 January 15, 2009 12:48
what's wrong about my code for 2d burgers equation morxio Main CFD Forum 3 April 27, 2007 11:38
REAL GAS UDF brian FLUENT 6 September 11, 2006 09:23


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 21:36.